Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/13/2002 8:13:00 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: pabianice
There's a simple answer to this, one I was totally surprised at: it comes down to filters and fibers.

Back when, pool filters were pretty basic; they used sand to run the water through. The way the filters were built, fiber, especially from natural materials, would collect in the interstices between the sand grains. There, they could develop quite vigorous colonies of microorganisms, many of which just weren't healthy for human skin, eyes, and ears.
What about chlorine, you ask? Keeping it high enough to kill all that crap was also not good for human skin, etc. Besides, when it killed the stuff, that stuff was still in place, clogging the sand... and ready to feed more bugs in turn, if the chlorine wavered. But even if nothing grew there, the filters clogged, and did a poor job, and weren't easy to flush out.
In short, wearing clothes in the pool was a quick route to either chlorine counts high enough to drive people away, or disease.
This didn't depend on anyone using the pool being infected to set off; the fiber collected the dead skin cells and body oils we shed in vigorous activity, and that material inevitably housed all sorts of bacteria that could put people in the hospital if they thrived.

So the reason was indeed hygiene -- but it was to protect the swimmer from the pool more than the pool from the swimmer.

That's the sort of thing you learn when you're going to be head lifeguard at a public pool, with responsibility for pool chemistry, filters, and pumps.
Today's filters, commonly using diatomaceous earth, can be easily flushed, and are componentized so filter baffles with a problem can be easily removed and replaced.

My dad still doesn't believe that --; he says that swimsuits were a conspiracy by neo-Puritan clothing industrialists intent on expanding their sales.

58 posted on 02/02/2009 9:16:24 AM PST by TrailDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
All the recent news about pedophiles and child pornography has made me wonder about how our local YMCA was run back when I was a kid (late 1950s - early 1960s). No bathing suits were allowed in the Y pool. We kids (boys only, ages about 8-14) simply swam naked. Seemed a little odd at the time, but kids generally do as adults demand without thinking too much about it. There were men there, too, but they wore bathing suits.

And people wondered why the Village People chose to do a song about the YMCA.

59 posted on 02/02/2009 9:19:09 AM PST by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The kids and adults swam naked almost exclusively not too far back in the past before that.

Of course back then adults looked after kids, even those that weren’t there own, and nearly all kids had 2 parents, and the ones that didn’t those around looked out for all the more.

That, and the fact you got caught doing that stuff, people didn’t go to the cops over it, you just quietly disappeared.


60 posted on 02/02/2009 9:22:54 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The Y I swim at simply chlorinates the pool to any extremely high level, making nude swimming unnecessary.


61 posted on 02/02/2009 9:30:55 AM PST by JacksonCalhoun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
I can see how it is hard for people today to think that the YMCA could allow nude swimming and such. You must understand that back then, there wasn't the fear of child abuse because of the Christian values our Nation had back then. You must also understand, this was the norm. Not only the YMCA aloud nude activities, but also did other public pools and public schools. What stopped nudity wasn't the fear of sexual abuse or the homosexual movement as some people might think. It was because, women wanted to use the pools at the same time as the men. So, modesty was needed. What is so ironic is that after nudity was restricted, our country was seeing an increase of sexual crimes and the Gay Movement was starting. In my personal view, I believe we have taken away what was needed in our men and boys. We needed true role models and other men who we can compare ourselves to. If there is someone to blame about the Gay movement and a large number of child abusers, I would blame it on the Extreme Feminist.
But that is my own opinion. Today, many boys and men can't have true friendships with each other because there isn't a safe place to hang around naked and not be ashamed. most men are also afraid to be called gay, even though they aren't. Soon an uncle can't hug his nephew without people accusing him of some sexual activity. It's sad.

Here is a website that is trying to change America back to the old way of thinking. These men might not have any susses, but they are on the right track of thinking.

http://gasguys.wordpress.com

62 posted on 05/08/2010 1:12:22 PM PDT by Sirnarnian (Y.M.C.A. wasn't Gay and nore is Nude Swimming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson