Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush lobbying U.S. Congress on amnesty for Mexican illegals
The News (Mexico City) ^ | February 16, 2002

Posted on 02/16/2002 4:32:59 AM PST by sarcasm

President George W. Bush is "pressuring" Congress to open discussions on a plan to offer amnesty to more than three million illegal Mexican immigrants living in the U.S., the Washington Times reported Friday.

In a front-page article, the newspaper said the U.S. leader would bring up the issue of amnesty during his meeting with President Vicente Fox on March 22 in the northern city of Monterrey.

"Amnesty and the related "guest-worker" issue have surfaced anew partly because Mr. Bush is preparing once more to take up the matter with Mexican President Vicente Fox in Monterrey," the article read.

Bush will travel to Monterrey to attend a conference on financing international development, organized by the United Nations.

At their meeting in Washington last year, Fox asked Bush to find a way to legalize the more than three million Mexican illegal immigrants living in the U.S.

The issue of immigration between the U.S. and Mexico was relegated to the back burner after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. But U.S. officials have made efforts to emphasize they have not forgotten about Mexico.

A number of Republican congress members told the newspaper the White House was lobbying Congress to prepare the terrain for negotiations on immigration.

Tom Tancredo, representative from Colorado and president of the Immigration Reform Caucus, has been targeted because of his opposition to the Fox proposal. Tancredo is against granting amnesty to illegal immigrants because he said it would "reward" people for breaking immigration laws.

But Bush administration officials insist the country needs foreign workers to perform jobs many U.S. workers may not want to do. They also argue granting legal status to currently illegal workers could stem the flow of immigrants, if combined with better law enforcement cooperation with Mexico.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last
Expect a massive run on the border now that this story has hit the Mexican papers.
1 posted on 02/16/2002 4:32:59 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
"Illegal- Against or not authorized by law"-Blacks 6th, Pg 747.

Just what about that confuses Baby Bush? If he wants to live in Mexico, let him move there. If Mexicans want to become American citizens there is a procedure specified in our law to do so. Otherwise, they are ILLEGAL ALIENS, period. Deport them.

Boonie Rat, MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66

2 posted on 02/16/2002 4:49:45 AM PST by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I will agree with Bush on this one when they cancel Federal and State Income taxes for all Americans.

This is a bunch of CRAP and Bush should Know Better

Just Like his Father, He seems destined to Snatch Defeat from the jaws of Victory..

Vincente Fox should stick to selling Coca Cola or whatever he used to sell!!!

As Bush might have said in earlier days,"You are either legal or you are Illegal".

3 posted on 02/16/2002 5:04:04 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I'm beginning to despise our fearless leader.
4 posted on 02/16/2002 5:11:39 AM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
A law is a law. Anyone who willingly violates the law, or fails to enforce the law, is a lawbreaker. The spectrum is from top leadership to the poorest border jumper.

Why do the "soft" laws apply to immigrants, minoritys, and unpopular factions, while the hard laws apply to the citizens who deserve enforcement, but have misplaced trust? The letter of the law is specific. I have never seen a law that pertains to one group while allowing another "equal" human group to slide.

Pathetic leadership. I voted for Bush, but he is no better than the Gores and the Clintons. Bush is just a different model, but made by the same system. Is there any politician left who is for the PEOPLE OF AMERICA WHO VALUE OUR HERITAGE?

5 posted on 02/16/2002 5:35:03 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I dont understand why President Bush is pushing this. We need to deport all illegals: Mexicans, Arabs, Chinese,etc.. I doesn't matter where they are from. Illegal is illegal. We need to seal our border for our own security.
6 posted on 02/16/2002 6:04:46 AM PST by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
...granting legal status to currently illegal workers could stem the flow of immigrants,...

Seems to me if the U.S. continues to give amnesty to illegal aliens they have all the more incentive to cross the border.

7 posted on 02/16/2002 6:13:19 AM PST by scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
"Bush administration officials insist the country needs foreign workers to perform jobs many U.S. workers may not want to do. They also argue granting legal status to currently illegal workers could stem the flow of immigrants, if combined with better law enforcement cooperation with Mexico. "

I don't believe that Americans are unwilling to do these jobs. The issue may have more to do with what employers are willing to pay. What, I wonder, is the hidden cost of importing workers who demand less? Is the economic burden shifted from the employer to the tax-payer?

Apparently amnesty did not "stem the flow of immigrants" the first time it was tried and now it seems that there is only speculation that it "could"this time.

If Bush wants to change the immigration laws then let him deport the illegals, change the law, and let foreign workers re-enter the country in accordance with the new laws. Why indeed reward immigrants who brake the law with amnesty, and why only Mexicans?
8 posted on 02/16/2002 6:22:54 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
But Bush administration officials insist the country needs foreign workers to perform jobs many U.S. workers may not want to do. They also argue granting legal status to currently illegal workers could stem the flow of immigrants, if combined with better law enforcement cooperation with Mexico.

What BS. America has millions of able bodied people collecting welfare. This is how Bush intends to use his 85 percent approval rating? It is obvious that Bush intends to turn America into a majority third world population as soon as possible. This will not only destroy the republican party as we know it but will also destroy America as we know it.

12 posted on 02/16/2002 7:11:02 AM PST by majordivit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane;Howlin
An "ahem" ping.
13 posted on 02/16/2002 7:11:57 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
You can give us a ping when you find an article with a NAME in it. I don't ever believe anonymous quotes; the people in this administration who know what is going on do not leak; that would be George W. Bush.
14 posted on 02/16/2002 7:19:01 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Major Malfunction
Bush better be right that this amnesty will win him votes from the pro-amnesty crowd.

If Bush follows through with this amnesty for illegal aliens, he's lost my whole family's vote in '2004.

The same goes for any politician that supports this act of betrayal of the American people's trust.

16 posted on 02/16/2002 8:31:55 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
I dont understand why President Bush is pushing this. We need to deport all illegals: Mexicans, Arabs, Chinese,etc.. I doesn't matter where they are from. Illegal is illegal. We need to seal our border for our own security.

I don't understand why anyone is suprised by this. Everyone should have known Bush's politics on this issue; it's not like he has been hiding it, and plenty of people have been trying to warn you about it - and they got shouted down here on FR and elsewhere because of those in the grip of the Bush-must-win-at-all-costs crowd. Now, maybe Bush was the best we could have hoped for in 2000, but we should not act suprised when he acts in favor of the business and internationalist interests he is a declared supporter of.

But then, that's "democracy" for you: "heads" you get a vaguely left-of-center internationalist, globalist, and elitist - "tails" you get a vaguely right-of-center internationalist, globalist, and elitist. We have the "democracy" and the government we deserve.

17 posted on 02/16/2002 8:39:17 AM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
If Bush follows through with this amnesty for illegal aliens, he's lost my whole family's vote in '2004.

Same here. This is my litmus test for Bush and any other candidate in the Republican party.

18 posted on 02/16/2002 8:54:13 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: majordivit
What BS. America has millions of able bodied people collecting welfare. This is how Bush intends to use his 85 percent approval rating?

Good point. And allowing this perversity of uncontrolled immigration (both illegal and legal) to continue will only keep our struggling lower class at the bottom. You'd think that Bush would have a much higher degree of compassion for Americans that need work than the lawbreaking illegal bunch here. Yet, apparently he does not.

19 posted on 02/16/2002 9:04:35 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Major Malfunction
This is how much this guy cares about Americans: US military personnel are deployed across the globe, taking hostile fire, bombing suspected hideouts, having sappers attack air bases and having to fight them off.

Meanwhile, he heads down to Mexico to listen to demands from the president of a country that can only make demands because 1/5 of all of his people have stampeded out of his country. Why does that give him any rights to make any demands of this country? Is it because...he's invaded, and now he wants to dictate the terms of surrender?

The Mexicans are laughing at Bush. They think he's weak. Thousands of his own people were killed, millions more are out of work, terrorists are still operating in the country (anyone want to venture a guess as to who killed Katherine Smith, the Tennessee DMV employee?), but he comes running whenever Vicente snaps his fingers.

Vote for the guy again? The only damn reason I voted for him in the first place is because he said "oh, I'll pertect the border". Yeah. The border of Bosnia with Serbia. Our border he could care less about.

What George Washington started, George Bush intends to end: The Independence of the United States.

20 posted on 02/16/2002 9:06:21 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson