Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Okiegolddust
"You are assuming most systems start from stable equilibrium in the first place"

Well… you may have just assumed that yourself. I assume the aggregate fish population was relatively stable since the last ice age. Perhaps not, there may have been other catastrophes, but I'm not aware of them. So now in the industrial/information age the fish/predator equilibrium is going to have to adjust.

I really don’t care it people want to ban together to preserve species for sport or economics. I only have a problem when people think we're going to drive them all into extinction without drastic new action.

177 posted on 02/18/2002 12:41:46 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: elfman2
I only have a problem when people think we're going to drive them all into extinction without drastic new action.

Extinction per se isn't the issue. Depletion to the point of uselessness is, in economic terms, the same thing. We are certainly headed there if nothing is done.

Look at the whaling industry. It used to be big business, and while the whales aren't exactly extinct, the industry itself is gone. (Yeah, I know, government drove the last tiny remnant of it out of existence, but what really killed it was lack of whales.) We could use that industry back again. People need jobs, and I myself wouldn't mind tucking into a nice, big whaleburger. But to do that, it takes whales.

185 posted on 02/18/2002 12:54:46 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson