Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional Amendment IV - Airport Screening
self | 03/05/02 | Mark and Karen Davis

Posted on 03/04/2002 10:51:44 PM PST by Cobra64

My wife and I, both age 52, will be travelling 09 March from ERW to CLT.

We will have two carry-on bags for a five day personal business trip.

Based upon past travel experiences with screeners, we plan on setting them up for a photo op. No, not like the whacko this week.

We will have a copy of Amendment IV of the United States Constitution with us. I will pass security first, and after I've had my 150 lb torso wanded, patted, and poked; Karen will be ready to walk through the magnetrometer tunnel. Concurrently, from a far distance, I will have a digital single frame camera ready to capture the screener's "groping" opportunities of my wife.

Rhetorical question: Can American citizens take pictures of their wives in public places... including airports? If some illegal SOB gropes my wife's boobs, it will be digitally captured and I will spread it like wildfire all over the internet. The first contact will be Ridge, Minetta second, and W third.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
I thought that I'd get post this question here since there has been so much controversy with the dopey Minetta/Ridge ineffective bozos supporting their moronic commercial aircraft travel security procedures.

Any thoughts, comments, criticisms, from my fellow FReeper friends?

We're NOT looking for trouble, just trying to make a point about RESPONSIBILITY in the commercial airline travel industry.

1 posted on 03/04/2002 10:51:44 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Just have the wife sceam at the top of her lungs she's being sexually assaulted if she gets touched in a manner she doesn't like - that will create enough of a scene, should bring out a cop, and tell the cop you want to press charges. If you do this, I hope you're at the airport at least 12 hours before your flight - you'll need the extra time...
2 posted on 03/04/2002 10:57:33 PM PST by Keith in Iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
I'd like to see some photos of the alleged "tips" jars. Those would look real pretty if CC'ed to the proper department heads.
3 posted on 03/04/2002 10:58:34 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
Amendment IV does not say you have to fly. Apply the Nancy Reagan drug pronouncement and just say no when asked to fly. Ridge and Mineta have no clue when it comes to security. Include Bush on his statements concerning profiling.

When you have to include toddlers, grandmothers, and blode-haired babes in your screening process so that you can prove you are not profiling Mideastern male terrorist look-alikes, the inmates are running the asylum and it is not pretty.

4 posted on 03/04/2002 11:13:44 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
. If you do this, I hope you're at the airport at least 12 hours before your flight - you'll need the extra time...

I have this covered. Our appointments are not until 11 March. In addressing the "harassment scenario", I'm prepared to change our flight schedules and pay $100.00 x 2.

On the bottom of our pre-printed form of the Fourth Amenedent document, I have prepared a pre-printed census form for the FBI agent to complete. His/her name, date, time, place, purpose, findings, cause, comments, etc.

I'll sit there naked with handcuffs until they can explain why a 52 year old blading 150 lb. WASP has been selected to be profiled, or my wife (not balding and not a guy) has been selected to be profiled and fondled.

If you hear about some "nut case" in EWR or CLT, it's probably me.

FYI, I've been travelling for over 20 years as a business analyst... 27 states and 13 countries; I know the drill, pack very light, don't carry anything metallic or electronic through the magnetrometer. Foil from gum wrappers have set these alarms off! Karen says I should disrobe, put on a shop coat, and walk barefoot through security. I told her to do the same, permitting easier groping for Tom Ridge's new cast of thousands of Feds.

5 posted on 03/04/2002 11:33:09 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Here's an idea to be able to prove inappropriate touching...get some powder that's invisable in normal light, but lights up under UV light, and 'dust' places that should not be touched; then, all you need to do is break out a UV light, and the screener's hands should glow if they've been places they shouldn't; and prints should be visable where the touching occured - ie less powder visable under UV light.
6 posted on 03/04/2002 11:45:37 PM PST by Keith in Iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meenie
right on! just say no (more money for stupid airline companies, no silly non-racial-profiling 'searches', etc)
7 posted on 03/05/2002 12:49:43 AM PST by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson