Are you always this confused...or did I hit your fragile ego where it hurts?
No where in my statement did I suggest a "theocracy," nor did I suggest the actions of Cardinal Law are to be absolved or forgotten. I did suggest there is a problem of continuing to allow imorality a "public forum" to preach a one-way hatred of all things Christian!
If you want to reply, go ahead...I'm off to a fund-raiser to support a charitable organization... so I won't be able to reply until (probably) 9 P.M. PST...
But you just go about telling yourself what a great father you are ...kids just love to hear their parents say "It's bad for you...but I can't take a public stand against it...becuse people might think I'm intolerant!"
I hope you succeed in raising your children to be fine moral, caring human beings! Sincerely!
Perhaps you can point out to them the great men and women of history who sat back and did nothing!
you don't have to mention the word theocracy to wish it upon us...look at your statement "a problem of continuing to allow immorality a public forum", what exactly does that suggest to you? It sounds as though you want to shut it down because it is immoral - looks, walks and talks like a theocracy to me, when religious beliefs dictate that which can be communicated/spoken publically. Clearly the confusion is yours. Nice try, though, in pretending the issue is mine. Have you looked at the constitution recently/ever?
As far as the cardinal is concerned, exactly how is he any better than Howard Stern? Why are you not railing against him for allowing child sex offenders to continue their assaults? Howard only talks about degradation, the cardinal *enabled* it. He is the poster child for those who do nothing about the problem. Please take your blinders off, but be careful, the view may be startling to you.