Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret 1989 MLB Probe reveals "Dirty" Umps...
ESPN ^ | 4/8/02 | NY Daily News

Posted on 03/07/2002 8:44:10 PM PST by The Drowning Witch

It appears Pete Rose wasn't the only person from baseball involved with gambling in 1989.

Major League Baseball's front office secretly conducted a gambling investigation centered on umpires amid the Rose gambling probe 13 years ago, the New York Daily News reported Friday.

According to documents obtained by the newspaper, the investigation produced a written report by Rose investigator John Dowd and two years' probation for two of baseball's most highly regarded umpires Frank Pulli of the National League and Rich Garcia of the American League.

The report stated the umps were disciplined for "associating and doing business with gamblers and bookmakers," which violated Major League Rule 21 -- the "best interests of baseball" rule. Late commissioner Bart Giamatti started the probe and was signed and enforced by his successor, former commissioner Fay Vincent.

Dowd told the Daily News the two umps cooperated with the investigation and were sanctioned for placing bets with "local bookies." Pulli still works for baseball as an umpire supervisor, a job he has held for the last two years, and Garcia is being considered for a similar job.

"It's serious when you try to protect the game from this whole problem of gambling, which raises issues of debt and compromise," Dowd told the News. "We were acutely tuned in to how serious it was with people trying to associate with Major League umpires."

According to the Daily News, MLB confirmed the gambling sanctions and defended its decision to keep the investigation a secret, its hiring of Pulli as a supervisor and its plan to bring in Garcia.

"They made a mistake," Executive vice president of baseball operations Sandy Alderson told the Daily News of the umpires. "From my standpoint, there's absolutely no question about their integrity, commitment to the game or to the profession of umpiring."

Vincent recently told the Daily News the umpire probe didn't rise to the level of the Rose case because there was no proof the umps bet on baseball, as Rose was accused of doing. Rose has been banned from baseball and denied admission to the Hall of Fame.

"If there was any case involving umpires," Vincent told the paper, "it didn't involve betting on baseball."

Vincent wrote letters to Pulli and Garcia concerning Giamatti's institution of the investigation on Aug. 14, 1989.

Dowd said the umpires' cooperation with the investigation was thorough.

"When confronted, they were honest about it," Dowd told the Daily News. "They were men about it."

Current commissioner Bud Selig refused to comment on the investigation, saying it did not occur under his administration.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Maybe now I have the reason why Eric Gregg wasn't reinstated....
1 posted on 03/07/2002 8:44:10 PM PST by The Drowning Witch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Drowning Witch
No, Eric Gregg wasn't reinstated because every time the ball was hit, it tended to gravitate towards Eric due to his immense girth.

Plus I'm still pissed at him for his 35 foot wide strike zone in the NLCS (Florida vs. Atlanta). The Braves could've used boat paddles and they still couldn't have reached those pitches.

2 posted on 03/07/2002 8:49:15 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Drowning Witch; all


Pay up.
Ammo costs.


"We have to stay vigilant, we have to fight, we can not let the RATS
destroy our Republic! We have made a difference. Free Republic is that tool for
us to gather, meet like minded individuals and fight for all we believe.
Keep this web site running. The liberals hate us, so we must be on the right track!"
- WIMom


Free Republic is funded solely by donations from readers.
Donations and official correspondence should be mailed to:
Free Republic, LLC, PO Box 9771, Fresno, CA 93794

Support Free Republic by secure credit card.

Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

3 posted on 03/07/2002 8:52:25 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
absolumont, Pokey....
Bump
4 posted on 03/07/2002 8:59:39 PM PST by The Drowning Witch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BluesDuke,LanceyHoward
FYI BUMP

I move for Pete Rose's immediate induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame.

5 posted on 03/08/2002 6:01:58 AM PST by TexasNative2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
Thanks for the ping.

I agree that baseball should get their heads out of their rears and put Rose in the Hall, sooner rather than later.

6 posted on 03/08/2002 11:24:46 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000; LanceyHoward
I move for Pete Rose's immediate induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame.

May we please remember that Pete Rose did everything in his power to prevent baseball from discovering the truth about his gambling activities, which doesn't appear to be the case with Frank Pulli and Rich Garcia? And, that had Pete Rose been forthright from the outset he just might have gotten off with nothing worse than a one- or maybe two-year suspension from baseball rather than what he still has?
7 posted on 03/08/2002 5:40:40 PM PST by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I agree that baseball should get their heads out of their rears and put Rose in the Hall, sooner rather than later.

One point of clarification: The Hall of Fame is a completely separate and independent entity from organised major league baseball, which can and does make its own rules for eligibility - one of which is that no one on baseball's permanently ineligible list may be considered for Hall of Fame enshrinement.
8 posted on 03/08/2002 5:48:49 PM PST by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BluesDuke
Pete Rose did everything in his power to prevent baseball from discovering the truth about his gambling

Thanks for the clarification. My initial reaction, as posted, was an emotional one. Upon reflection, your point is well taken.

9 posted on 03/08/2002 8:24:22 PM PST by TexasNative2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Drowning Witch
What about the NFL refs?
10 posted on 03/08/2002 8:29:05 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
Thanks for the clarification. My initial reaction, as posted, was an emotional one. Upon reflection, your point is well taken.

Believe me, the point is not one I take pleasure in making. The Pete Rose affair didn't have to conclude as it did. And the saddest part of it is, he had no one to blame for that but Pete Rose.
11 posted on 03/08/2002 9:11:16 PM PST by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson