Skip to comments.
U.S. repatriating Pakistani detainees
Washington Post via MSNBC ^
| 3-7-02
Posted on 03/08/2002 4:28:20 AM PST by mikenola
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:02 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
NEW YORK, March 7
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: terrorwar
1
posted on
03/08/2002 4:28:20 AM PST
by
mikenola
To: mikenola; *TerrOrWar; aristeides
Interesting article. Now they can go home and continue their jihad against our troops.
I wonder if there's a connection here to the extradiction or trial of Pearl's killers? Muscharraf seems to be backpeddling--maybe waiting for his operatives to be returned?
To: Lion's Cub
After reading the article, it appears most of those sent back are visa overstayers and illegal immigrants, not the Gitmo style terrorists. If no terrorist ties are found, it is logical to release them and kick their arses out of the country.
To: Lion's Cub
Now they can go home and continue their jihad against our troops. Would you want them to be let go here and wage a jihad against American civilians.
You all are so funny. People are being deported back to Pakistan and yet this is a mistake in your eyes.
4
posted on
03/08/2002 4:52:30 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Rubber Ducky; Dane
I believe Pakistan was on the State Department list of terrorist states until Muscharraf suddenly repented after 9/11. In addition, it is well documented that Pakistan was a major supporter of the Taliban and the al-Qaeda training camps. Therefore, I see no reason for not exercising extra caution with his illegal immigrants and overstayed visa holders. I'd have held them until the course of Pakistan is a bit clearer--or at least until our borders are under control.
To: Dane; Lion's Cub
[Criminal aliens] are being deported to Pakistan and yet this is a mistake in your eyes.
Would you consider it likely that some of us would rather just shoot the bastards where we find them?
To: Dane
You all are so funny. People are being deported back to Pakistan and yet this is a mistake in your eyes.How bout we keep them here in jail and nobody get jihaded?
To: Invincibly Ignorant
How bout we keep them here in jail and nobody get jihaded? How about we air-mail them to the caves above Gardez, strapped to cruise missiles (the pro-jihad ones, that is)?
8
posted on
03/08/2002 9:21:36 AM PST
by
Argus
To: mikenola
Must be a capture-recapture procedure to estimate how many fish are in the pond. Don't know why else you'd let 'em go.
To: mikenola
No Fruit Loops for you!
To: Invincibly Ignorant
"How bout we keep them here in jail and nobody get jihaded?" How about cause I'm tired of paying for their air conditioning and color TV. Send them all back where they came from and let them work for a living. Why do we need to support every illegal dip-*hit that manages to sneek into the country?
11
posted on
03/08/2002 12:04:20 PM PST
by
monday
To: Invincibly Ignorant
How bout we keep them here in jail and nobody get jihaded?
How about we round up all the Jihadis from all over the world keep them in Jail here so nobody can start Jihad?
To: Lion's Cub
I believe Pakistan was on the State Department list of terrorist states until Muscharraf suddenly repented after 9/11Not true. Pakistan was never on that list. Perhaps it deserved to be, but it was not.
13
posted on
03/08/2002 5:15:50 PM PST
by
AM2000
To: mikenola
What's wrong with Cuba?
To: AM2000
Thanks for that info.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson