Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR Court Challenge Team Being Assembled
CBS Radio News | 3/21/02 | Me

Posted on 03/21/2002 12:09:02 PM PST by RamsNo1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: toenail
Do as I say... Not as I do?
21 posted on 03/21/2002 12:56:13 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: toenail
Could it be possible that W knew all along that this bill would be challenged immediately after the vote, that he'll weather it out until the courts rule on the bill before he signs?? What happens if he doesn't sign before the 10 days??
22 posted on 03/21/2002 1:02:09 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Of course it will be challenged -- it's an attack on our freedom.

Which side of the attack is Bush on?

23 posted on 03/21/2002 1:09:55 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: toenail
If the SCOTUS rules unconstitutional, will the media ask that idiot McCain how come he didn't know he was pushing bad legislation
24 posted on 03/21/2002 1:33:31 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
Do you think MSNBC will let Dan Abrams cover this?
25 posted on 03/21/2002 1:35:15 PM PST by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I was just thinking the same thing. The Abrams report, with Dan saying, "I have to recuse myself from commenting because my dad is defending the ubconstitutionality of this bill".

I wondered whether or not Lloyd Abrams was a republican, during the Florida debacle he seemed to always favor the Bush team.

26 posted on 03/21/2002 1:50:55 PM PST by peekaboo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: peekaboo
I've always thought Floyd Abrams was an ACLU type Democrat, but he knows the Constitution backward forward and inside-out. If he seemed to be on the right side during the recount, it's because it was the constitutional side. I'm glad he's on the anti-CFR team.

Can you imagine the panty-twist of big media, if they are on Ashcroft's side against Abrams? What a sight to behold!

27 posted on 03/21/2002 2:26:53 PM PST by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
That statement is false. The Solicitor General and the Attorney General are both subject to the President's direction. Both can be instructed to oppose a law, rather than defend it. This has bee done at least five times, by various Presidents.

Conressman Billybob

28 posted on 03/21/2002 2:44:24 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"They don't have to put up a really great defense."

May I respectfully suggest the Justice Department hire David Boies...???

29 posted on 03/21/2002 5:11:38 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson