Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
As usual people would much rather refer to individuals as the making up of a whole group... the uneducated will come forth and preach their gospel as the word because they choose not to open their eyes. Clearly by trying to link the two is like saying if I take apples and if i mix them with Peaches then I can make rain! Clearly as priests, as well as with prison mates the only way to express one's what sexuality is with other men.. it's not a matter of someone being gay or not as more of a crime of opportunity.. While you have the right to be a "homophobe" merely states that you are afriad of your own sexuality.. if you can't talk to or be friend's with a gay man then maybe you are afriad he'll take advantage of you.. clearly if you were secure with yourself you certainly wouldn't think he would try to make any moves on you do you? But that's right..g ay men just can't control themselves and he would be forced to throw himself on you right? Not that their aren't gay men out there that can't no for an answer.. but I believe that falls into rape and last time I checked it wasn't jsut gay men that committed that... you might want to go back and think about what a homophobe really is but you start spouting off such nonsense.
11 posted on 03/24/2002 7:49:36 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Almondjoy
While you have the right to be a "homophobe" merely states that you are afriad of your own sexuality..

What? The libs just make up their own definition of homophobic and you make one up too? Websters defines phobic as "an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation". But that not the way people here are talking about homophobic, they just don't want them around. I haven't seen one post that fits with the definition of "phobic" here. "Afraid of your own sexuality?" Take that to Webster will you? It doesn't flush here.

151 posted on 03/24/2002 10:12:13 PM PST by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Almondjoy
Please learm html. Then try a coherent response, even though your defense of homosexuality is naive and misinformed. The matter is neatly summed up by the poster Montag813:

The homosexual lifestyle is principally about sex, and not about "stable, loving relationships which are no different from anyone else", as we are supposed to naively accept.

Homosexuals, back in the closet.

217 posted on 03/25/2002 11:36:22 AM PST by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson