[Clint N. Suhks]

That's why when someone serves up a premise from which I can derive the negation of their conclusion, they've got a problem.

Sorry, I thought that’s what I was doing.

But just because I use their premise in a reductio on their position doesn't mean I'm endorsing it.

Gee, that’s hard to tell from your posts but I’ll take you word for it. So you agree then that the pursuit of happiness clause doesn’t prohibit “consensual homosexual sex should [can] be regulated by the state?

[ConsistentLibertarian]

If your asking what's the right moral principle, I'll start with: leave people alone to do what they want in the privacy of their own home if they aren't hurting anybody else. It's all part of my anti-liberal, individual freedom, smaller government agenda.