Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hobblemaster
And that Neo-Nazi feminist is certainly not castingating people, certainly not males as Goebbles did for the JEws. This woman is either primitively stupid, or she is just another cunning agitator who knows she can get a large base of supporters by targetting stupid women. As Goebbles said, the stupider, short of directly insulting, the propaganda, the more effective. She certainly has learned lot's from her masters of politics. Replace below Goebbles by Steinmen and Jews by men and Germany by the world and America, and you get the picture of the carbon copy of Goebbles is Steinmen. The American people need to do a bit of homework, just a tiny bit, so that we can get rid of the fascists in the US of A. The damned nazies might as well be titled the damned feminists

Why Do We Oppose the Jews?

Why Do We Oppose the Jews?

We oppose the Jews because we are defending the freedom of the German people. The Jew is the cause and beneficiary of our slavery He has misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our people, to divide Germany into two halves thereby concealing the true reason for the loss of the Great War and falsifying the nature of the revolution.

The Jew has no interest in solving the German question. He cannot have such an interest. He depends on it remaining unsolved. If the German people formed a united community and won back its freedom, there would be no place any longer for the Jew. His hand is strongest when a people lives in domestic and international slavery, not when it is free, industrious, self-aware and determined. The Jew had caused our problems, and lives from them.

That is why we oppose the Jew as nationalists and as socialists. He has ruined our race, corrupted our morals, hollowed out our customs and broken our strength. We owe it to him that we today are the Pariah of the world. He was the leper among as long as we were German. When we forgot our German nature, he triumphed over us and our future.

The Jew is the plastic demon of decomposition. Where he finds filth and decay, he surfaces and begins his butcher's work among the nations. He hides behind a mask and presents himself as a friend to his victims, and before they know it he has broken their neck.

The Jew is uncreative. He produces nothing, he only haggles with products. With rags, clothing, pictures, jewels, grain, stocks, cures, peoples and states. He has somehow stolen everything he deals in. When he attacks a state he is a revolutionary. As soon as he holds power, he preaches peace and order so that he can devour his conquests in comfort.

What does anti-Semitism have to do with socialism? I would put the question this way: What does the Jew have to do with socialism? Socialism has to do with labor. When did one ever see him working instead of plundering, stealing and living from the sweat of others? As socialists we are opponents of the Jews because we see in the Hebrews the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation's goods.

What does anti-Semitism have to do with nationalism? I would put the question this way: What does the Jew have to do with nationalism? Nationalism has to do with blood and race. The Jew is the enemy and destroyer of the purity of blood, the conscious destroyer of our race. As nationalists we oppose the Jews because we see the Hebrews as the eternal enemy of our national honor and of our national freedom.

But the Jew after all is also a human being. Certainly, none of us doubts that. We only doubt that he is a decent human being. He does not get along with us. He lives by other laws than we do. The fact that he is a human being is not sufficient reason for us to allow him to subject us in inhumane ways. He may be a human being—but what kind of a human being is he! If someone slaps your mother in the face, do you say: "Thank you! He is after all a human being!" That is not a human being, it is a monster. Yet how much worse has the Jew done to our mother Germany, and is still doing today!

There are also white Jews. True, there are scoundrels among us, even though they are Germans, who act in immoral ways against their own racial and blood comrades. But why do we call them white Jews? You use the term to describe something inferior and contemptible. Just as we do. Why do you ask us why we oppose the Jews when you without knowing it are one too?

Anti-Semitism is not Christian. That means that it is Christian to allow the Jews to go on as they are, stripping the skin from our bodies and mocking us. To be a Christian means to love one's neighbor as oneself! My neighbor is my racial and blood brother. If I love him I have to hate his enemies. He who thinks German must despise the Jews. The one requires the other.

Christ himself saw that love did not always work. When he found the moneychangers in the Temple, he did not say: "Children, love one another!" He took up a whip and drove them out.

We oppose the Jews because we affirm the German people. The Jew is our greatest misfortune.

It is not true that we have Jews for breakfast.

It is true that slowly but surely, he is stealing all that we have.

Things would be different if we behaved as Germans.

Revolutionary Demands

3 posted on 03/25/2002 3:37:02 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lavaroise
A tiny bit of MS Word "find and replace" and .... viola:

Why Do We Oppose the Men?

We oppose the Men because we are defending the freedom of the Feminist women. The Man is the cause and beneficiary of our slavery He has misused the social misery of the broad masses to deepen the dreadful split between the right and left of our women, to divide Feminism into two halves thereby concealing the true reason for the loss of the Great War and falsifying the nature of the revolution.

The Man has no interest in solving the Feminist question. He cannot have such an interest. He depends on it remaining unsolved. If the Feminist women formed a united community and won back its freedom, there would be no place any longer for the Man. His hand is strongest when a woman lives in domestic and international slavery, not when it is free, industrious, self-aware and determined. The Man had caused our problems, and lives from them.

That is why we oppose the Man as feminists and as socialists. He has ruined our gender, corrupted our morals, hollowed out our customs and broken our strength. We owe it to him that we today are the Pariah of the world. He was the leper among as long as we were Feminist. When we forgot our Feminist nature, he triumphed over us and our future.

The Man is the plastic demon of decomposition. Where he finds filth and decay, he surfaces and begins his butcher's work among the nations. He hides behind a mask and presents himself as a friend to his victims, and before they know it he has broken their neck.

The Man is uncreative. He produces nothing, he only haggles with products. With rags, clothing, pictures, manels, grain, stocks, cures, womens and states. He has somehow stolen everything he deals in. When he attacks a state he is a revolutionary. As soon as he holds power, he preaches peace and order so that he can devour his conquests in comfort.

What does sexism have to do with socialism? I would put the question this way: What does the Man have to do with socialism? Socialism has to do with labor. When did one ever see him working instead of plundering, stealing and living from the sweat of others? As socialists we are opponents of the Men because we see in the males the incarnation of capitalism, of the misuse of the nation's goods.

What does sexism have to do with feminism? I would put the question this way: What does the Man have to do with feminism? Feminism has to do with blood and gender. The Man is the enemy and destroyer of the purity of blood, the conscious destroyer of our gender. As feminists we oppose the Men because we see the males as the eternal enemy of our feminine honor and of our feminine freedom.

But the Man after all is also a human being. Certainly, none of us doubts that. We only doubt that he is a decent human being. He does not get along with us. He lives by other laws than we do. The fact that he is a human being is not sufficient reason for us to allow him to subject us in inhumane ways. He may be a human being-but what kind of a human being is he! If someone slaps your mother in the face, do you say: "Thank you! He is after all a human being!" That is not a human being, it is a monster. Yet how much worse has the Man done to our mother godess, and is still doing today!

There are also white men. True, there are scoundrels among us, even though they are Feminists, who act in immoral ways against their own racial and blood comrades. But why do we call them white Men? You use the term to describe something inferior and contemptible. Just as we do. Why do you ask us why we oppose the Men when you without knowing it are one too?

Sexism is not anti-Christian. That means that it is Christian to allow the Men to go on as they are, stripping the skin from our bodies and mocking us. To be a Christian means to love one's neighbor as oneself! My neighbor is my gender and blood sister. If I love her I have to hate her enemies. She who thinks Feminism must despise the Men. The one requires the other.

Christ himself saw that love did not always work. When he found the moneychangers in the Temple, he did not say: "Children, love one another!" He took up a whip and drove them out.

We oppose the Men because we affirm the Feminist women. The Man is our greatest misfortune.

It is not true that we have Men for breakfast.

It is true that slowly but surely, he is stealing all that we have.

Things would be different if we behaved as Feminists.

Revolutionary Demands


24 posted on 03/25/2002 6:07:28 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lavaroise
After reading the Nazi screed with "feminist" replacing "Nazi" and "man" replacing "Jew," it's pretty creepy to note that it doesn't do the feminism's hatred much justice... feminist rhetoric is actually much more hateful.
27 posted on 03/25/2002 6:12:37 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson