[PDR]

Nonsense... you cannot believe most of what AH writes... and as to Bush v. Clinton, it depends on when Morgan made the remarks -- was Perot in the race at the time he said it or not.

[drjimmy]

This is from Paul Gigot of the Wall Street Journal:
Most GOP strategists believe the Texas tyro wouldn't do nearly as well this year as his 19 percent of 1992. John Morgan, the GOP's best demographer, points out that even in 1992 Mr. Perot carried only 15 of America's 3,000 or so counties. He finished second in just two states, the non-bellwether Maine and Utah, winning no electoral votes. "There is no way Ross Perot can be elected president," Mr. Morgan says. "The only way he'd be in there is as a spoiler, and that argument wasn't made last time." Expect one Dole theme to be: A vote for Perot is a vote for Clinton. Mr. Morgan lists 11 states that George Bush lost by less than 5 percent in 1992 but that Sen. Dole has a good chance to carry, even in a three-man contest: New Hampshire, New Jersey, Georgia, Kentucky, Ohio, Montana, Nevada, Colorado, Louisiana, Wisconsin and Tennessee. Add their 107 electoral votes to Mr. Bush's 168, and Hillary Rodham Clinton goes back to trading commodities.