[CedarDave]

Not that it will change the minds of the enviro-nazis, but this study presents evidence that should have been evaluated before adoption of the new standard.

Check out the earlier article about Albuquerque and Arsenic here:

Albuquerque Battles to Leave Arsenic in the Water

[CedarDave]

BUMP!
(p.s. someone please bump this to the arsenic and environment files/archives, I can't seem to find a link to do so.)

[Own Drummer]

"[the benefits] could be negated by accidents involving the trucks that would take treatment chemicals to water plants."

Perhaps the trucks could be routed through the districts of all the Congress-turds who voted for this bill...

[DB]

"My gut feeling tells me we ought to spend the money in a way that delivers the most benefit to the most people," frost said. "You can imagine how much good $400 million would do in this state if it were directed to the prevention and treatment alcoholism or lowering smoking rates."

No, you shouldn't raise the water rates and collect that $400 million in the first place. Let the consumer do as they please with their money.

[Eva]

They did have all the information that showed that reduced arsenic levels may not be necessary, they just deleted it from the Harvard Arsenic study, before submitting it to the government. I know, I read the whole report, before it was finalized and shortened to fit the agenda.

[B4Ranch]

That last paragrah is amazing! Common sense is so nice to see.