Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Signs McCain-Democrat Campaign Finance Bill; Republicans File Suit
Newsmax.com ^ | March 28, 2002

Posted on 03/27/2002 4:03:29 PM PST by rightwing2

Bush Signs Campaign Finance Bill; NRA Sues
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, March 28, 2002


WASHINGTON – President Bush on Wednesday signed campaign finance legislation that restricts speech and bans unregulated donations to political parties. "I believe that this legislation, although far from perfect, will improve the current financing system for federal campaigns," Bush said in a statement. The measure immediately drew legal challenges. Within a short time of Bush's signing, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., had filed suit, as had National Rifle Association. Both denounced the law's infringement on freedom of speech. The law "eviscerates the core protections of the First Amendment by prohibiting, on pain on criminal punishment, political speech," said a legal complaint filed on behalf of NRA and its political victory fund. "We are proud to be one of the first plaintiffs to formally ask the federal court to invalidate these new limits on the political speech of ordinary citizens because we believe that this law cannot be allowed to stand, not even for a moment," stated Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the gun rights group. Bush signed the bill as he traveled to Greenville, S.C., and Atlanta to talk with emergency workers and on campaign fund-raising jaunts for Reps. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Saxby Chamblis, R-Ga.

The U.S. Senate approved the legislation on March 20 on a 60-40 vote that came hours after a last-ditch attempt to filibuster the bill. It was an identical version of the measure passed in February by the U.S. House of Representatives, avoiding a conference committee that could have been used to kill the bill. The campaign finance bill was sponsored by Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and John McCain, R-Ariz. Upon learning Bush signed the bill, McCain issued a statement saying, "I'm pleased that President Bush has signed campaign finance reform legislation into law."

'I May Hesitate'

While traveling through El Salvador on Sunday, Bush joked with reporters about placing his name on the bill once it arrived at the White House: "It will probably take about three seconds to get to the W, I may hesitate on the period, and then rip through the Bush." The law bans unlimited contributions, known as "soft money," to national political parties and restricts issue ads aired by interest groups before elections. Bush had called the measure "flawed" but had said he would sign it. "I wouldn't have signed it if I was really unhappy with it. I think it improves the system," Bush told reporters during a stop at Greenville firehouse. "And it improves the system because it enables an individual to give more money. And I want to do is have a system that encourages more individual participation, as well as more disclosure." Still, he said, he had been concerned about a system where money was given to entities and stakeholders had no say. He said he was concerned mostly about corporate shareholders and labor union members not having the ability to object to how their money was being spent. However, although no one is required to buy stock in any company, many workers must pay union dues to have a job.

Opponents of the bill, such as McConnell, say the new law represents an unconstitutional limit to political speech. They note that limiting political advertising by non-affiliated groups will protect incumbents, further empower the media and remove the ability of citizens to band together over common political causes. McCain said last week the scandal surrounding bankrupt Enron Corp., and revelations that the energy trader had donated money to 72 of 100 senators and had pushed electric supply and commodities deregulation though the U.S. Capitol and state houses, helped the cause. Copyright 2002 by United Press International.

All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-195 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: rightwing2
This I actually agree with...my Congresscritters are Schumer, Clinton, and Houghton.

None of them are worth the spit I just ejaculated when typing their names here, Houghton more typically votes with the other two scalawags than not from the House side.

Worse, in this particular state, you're more likely to have a liberal, former democrat, run on the Republican ticket with Republican GOP support than a conservative anywhere.
162 posted on 03/28/2002 1:44:00 PM PST by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What he doesn't realize is how the "secret signing" affected the legislation.
163 posted on 03/28/2002 2:11:34 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
I wanted so badly to like Bush and support him...

Hmmm.

Like I told you, Bush hasn't betrayed his republican and conservative supporters, nor has he taken them for granted either. While several of Bush's recent forays into political gamesmanship, have upset and confused some in his conservative base, I believe the vast majority of his supporters have had a measured response. Some, like yourself, have over reacted. I think very few conservatives were expecting Bush to initiate across the board conservative policies, with total disregard towards the loyal opposition. To think otherwise, is being naive in my book.

Ronald Reagan understood, that as President, he would never get his full conservative agenda passed through the Congress, 100% intact. This is something that President Bush also understands, but you, obviously do not understand. Compromise and negotiation are a major part of any president's game plan. This is especially true, when you consider, that at best, only 1/3rd of the American electorate, identifies themselves as politically conservative.

This charge that Bush is a liberal republican, is utterly ridiculous and without merit .

So you can exoriate those republicans and conseravtives who disagree with you, all you want, if that makes you feel better. However, the more you attack Bush and his supporters, for not agreeing with you, the more you look weak and petty.

164 posted on 03/28/2002 2:12:13 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
You're supporting Bill Clinton because he's a Republican.

Wow! Only a libertarian could come up with such convoluted nonsense.

165 posted on 03/28/2002 2:16:55 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Look, if your momma supported the same broken laws Clinton did, you'd still support her, just like you support Bush now. The only reason you opposed Clinton was because he was a Democrat...that's the position you articulated, live with it, retract your support.

It isn't twisted, it's an explanation of how emotional and absent principles your position actually is...it's been noted by other posters with different wording and you still don't get it.
166 posted on 03/28/2002 2:31:25 PM PST by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man, Howlin, Reagan Man, sonofliberty2, scholastic, OKCSubmariner
Ronald Reagan understood, that as President, he would never get his full conservative agenda passed through the Congress, 100% intact. This is something that President Bush also understands, but you, obviously do not understand...This charge that Bush is a liberal republican, is utterly ridiculous and without merit.

Sure, Bush is not a liberal. Rather he is a consumate bipartisan centrist and by definition does not hold fast to any particular princples liberal or conservatives, but rather has a centrist mix of both. What you fail to understand is that Bush is not a conservative and never has been. Sure I supported him because I wanted him to be a good President but I never was under any delusion that he was a conservative. The truth is that I started with very low expectations for his Presidency. I thought he would be only somewhat better than Gore. Then, I fell prey to the anyone-but Clinton syndrome. Certainly, after Clinton he seemed like a breath of fresh air and during his first few months he performed better than I expected.

However, Bush's action in signing the Democrat Incumbent Re-Election Act is so destructive of the conservative cause and so eviscerating for the Republican Party as to constitute an Armageddon for us (Republicans) again something you fail to understand. This is not merely amnestying two million illegal aliens. Its not just supporting federal funding for harvesting of stem-cells from aborted babies. Its not just supporting Clinton's Amerikorps program. Its not merely appeasing Communist China with $100 billion a year in US trade surplus money to enable it to build itself into the best superpower enemy money can buy and providing them with supercomputers 50-100 times more powerful than those sold under Bill Clinton during the Chinagate scandal. Its not just passing Ted Kennedy's bill which federalizes the public education system. Conservatives have fought against all these Bush initiatives for years if not decades. This is nothing short of Armageddon for the Republican Party!!! Why some Bush backers fail to understand this and try to excuse and justify this away when it is so much worse than anything else Bush has done (other than implementing the unilateral disarmament of 75% of our remaining strategic nuclear deterrent) is completely beyond me.

As Buchanan said in his book, Death of the West, "this is how it all ends." It is not an end I, a lifelong member of the Republican Party, would have chosen. When this bill is implemented, the Republican Party will be finished for all time as a majority party. If you were a committed Republican and not merely a Bush backer, this fact would concern you a bit more. For me, having a Republican majority in Congress for the first time in sixty years has been a very welcome and cherished historical moment which I have worked to prolong. Bush has now destroyed my hopes of so doing.
167 posted on 03/28/2002 5:41:02 PM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
Ah, now you've done it; quoted Pat to me.

Please remove me from your ping list.

168 posted on 03/28/2002 5:42:44 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Well, let the snookering begin!

I'm hoping you are right in your thoughtful input. Thanks.

169 posted on 03/28/2002 6:52:15 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2;Texasforever;harpo11

Hell the entire bill could be thrown out

BUMP

Read why the majority opinion of the Supreme Court found that party expenditures were independent of the candidate, and thus not covered by legislative caps, but rather entitled to First Amendment protection

Learn more about the landmark decision that rejected portions of the Federal Election Campaign Act claiming that it violated the First Amendment.

Campaign Finance Supreme Court Cases link here

170 posted on 03/28/2002 7:03:40 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
There are libs on the Court, but it is not a liberal Court overall. They helped Bush into office, or did you forget? I still think that the CFR will prove wholly unacceptable on a strictly Constiututional basis. If I'm wrong, then the Republic is really in trouble. P.S. The no profanity rule is still in effect.
171 posted on 03/28/2002 7:39:41 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: sonofliberty2
You are probably right in most cases. Thanks for the ping. Regards.
172 posted on 03/28/2002 8:48:55 PM PST by baxter999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
An eloquent and thoughtful commentary. Keep up the good work.
173 posted on 03/28/2002 8:52:29 PM PST by baxter999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
Does anyone honestly think that a court, that has ruled restrictions on flag burning, the recent bill aimed at pornography on the web and not allowing the display of Christ in a jar of urine are violations of the 1st amendment, will not rule against this bill as well?
174 posted on 03/28/2002 8:56:31 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: HalfIrish
If you are half-Irish, what is the other half? I am half-Irish and half-Ukrainian.
175 posted on 03/28/2002 8:57:58 PM PST by RamsNo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I met an admirer of your's on another thread, today. He was a chip off the ol' block. He stopped short though, of telling me to take my rope and go home. This freeper admired your sharp, quick wit and the substance you add to your commentary. Too bad that both of you don't remember that there is supposed to be a "new tone" to the debate in DC and in the country in general since Bush got in the white house. I think that Bush would be sadly disappointed in both of you for the lack of a kinder, gentler tone with your opponents.
176 posted on 03/28/2002 9:08:47 PM PST by RamsNo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
You should have quit while you were ahead. I warned you about those anti-Bush rants. This latest diatribe shows how deep rooted your hatred for the President is and has convinced me, beyond shadow of a doubt, that you never supported President Bush.

Bush is not a liberal and repeating such a lie, doesn't make it true. So far, Bush has shown himself to be a consumate conservative politician, in the mold of Ronald Reagan.

President Bush has promoted a conservative agenda. Here's a short list of his main accomplishments in a mere 14 months.

* has provided remarkable leadership in time of war
* secured passage through Congress of a $1.35 trillion tax cut
* has proposed the largest increases in military spending since Reagan
* opposed the Kyoto protocol
* disposed of the ABM Treaty
* eliminated taxpayer funding of overseas abortions
* has openly and strongly supported Taiwan
* made no deals for release of the EP-3 plane crew from Red China
* secured initial funding for a NMDS
* has promoted increases in off shore oil drilling
* has strongly advocated drilling in ANWR
* pushed for building more nuclear power plants
* campaigned to reduce our dependency on oil imports
* repealed many last minute Clinton EO`s
* campaigned for partial privatization of Social Security
* offered faith-based alternatives to traditional welfare
* stopped funding for further destruction of human embryo's
* has nominated conservative judges to the federal bench
* returned honor, dignity and trust to the Presidency

This isn't the record of a liberal, or a moderate. It is the record of a principled and pragmatic, mainstream conservative, who understands how to get the job done. Is it a perfect record, absolutely not. What the President wants, what I want and what the majority of conservative-republicans want, is political unity, not unanimity. With a slim majority in the House and Democrat control of the Senate, its impossible to win on every issue. Sometimes compromise and negotiation is the only viable alternative, for achieveing a partial victory on certain issues.

Bottom line, in poll after poll, American's continue to give the President high marks for his leadership, his honesty and for his strong integrity and personal character. His approval ratings have been in the 80% range. These high poll numbers, are mainly attributed to his successful handling of the war effort, but on individual issues, Bush has been very successful promoting his conservative policies, so far.

You can spin all you want, but your lies and distortions are obvious to anyone paying attention.

177 posted on 03/28/2002 9:14:17 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
President Bush had done alot of good even before 9/11 and after 9/11 but there are those of us who need to remind Bush that we are out here and what we expect of our elected officials. I would say that this website is a great way to vent our opinions just as you vent your's. We all have the right to do it at least for the time being.
178 posted on 03/28/2002 9:21:03 PM PST by RamsNo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Ah, now you've done it; quoted Pat to me. Please remove me from your ping list.

Certainly. Your reply is proof positive that you are no conservative and probably never were. Not like I couldn't tell from your comments defending Bush's evisceration of the Republican Party this week which prove that you are not a real Republican.
179 posted on 03/29/2002 6:35:22 AM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
There are libs on the Court, but it is not a liberal Court overall. They helped Bush into office, or did you forget? I still think that the CFR will prove wholly unacceptable on a strictly Constiututional basis. If I'm wrong, then the Republic is really in trouble. P.S. The no profanity rule is still in effect.

Yes, they voted to uphold the election since every single recount went Bush's way. How could they have done otherwise. If they had not done so, they would have plunged the country into constitutional chaos. However, "not a liberal Court overall?" Aren't we talking about the same court that found state and federal bans on partial birth aborton/infanticide to be constitutionally impermissable??? The Republic is in trouble all right and we have Bush to thank for it. There was no room for error or excuse on this.
180 posted on 03/29/2002 6:38:57 AM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson