Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnGalt
It just seems like, even if you're going to proceed on the assumption that Ron Brown's death was an assassination, there are a hell of a lot of ways to do it that make more sense, and are logistically easier to carry out, than shooting him straight down into the top of his head, then crashing the plane. Why not just plant a bomb on the plane? Then you could blame the Serbs or something. I'm sorry, I enjoy a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but this one is just too far fetched. It would be interesting to see, by way of comparison, what sorts of injuries people killed in non-suspicious plane crashes suffer.
32 posted on 04/05/2002 10:51:25 AM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Heyworth
I'm right there with you. I was just sharing with you an angle that whoever shot Ron Brown did not know the plane was scheduled to be blown up.
33 posted on 04/05/2002 11:01:00 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Heyworth
How or what happened is immaterial at this point. There are many scenarios that could explain the evidence. The question is, why wasn't an autopsy done? Why not do one now?
36 posted on 04/05/2002 3:44:15 PM PST by Earn Your Vote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Heyworth
Has anyone ever heard of a parachute before? I can't believe how shallow dissenteres can be.
43 posted on 06/10/2002 2:49:57 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson