Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur; History_Matters
First thought: who is paying for Bierschenk's lawyer? Second thought: why didn't he just comply? Third thought: why did he lie?

Thank goodness the Church has acted responsibly.

4 posted on 04/16/2002 6:09:10 AM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Angelique
First thought: who is paying for Bierschenk's lawyer? Second thought: why didn't he just comply? Third thought: why did he lie?

Did you read the stuff I bolded? Apparently, he didn't do ANY background checks. If he did, there was no evidence of them, anywhere.

St. Thomas is a wealthy parish, and there are no doubt lawyers in the parish. Arch McColl lives in Dallas, so he's likely one of them.

Why did he lie? Why does anybody lie? Who knows?

My impression is that he just didn't feel like these background checks were all that important. Like Fr. Efren Ortega, who was transferred for not checking the backgrounds of some nuns in his parish, Steve may feel that the diocese should just trust his judgement.

8 posted on 04/16/2002 6:22:53 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson