Skip to comments.
Is This The Real Noah's Ark, Found At Last? The Mystery Of The "Ararat Anomaly"
TooGood Reports ^
| 4/15/02
| Isaiah Flair
Posted on 04/16/2002 12:12:59 PM PDT by Good Tidings Of Great Joy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-122 next last
To: Good Tidings Of Great Joy
To view a fullsize image click on the thumbnail.
|
|
|
|
In 1959, stereo photos where taken by a Turkish airline pilot of a boat shaped object on the mountains of Ararat for The Geodetic Institute of Turkey. Dr. Brandenburger of Ohio State University, USA, after studying the photographs concluded, "I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photograph." Dr. Brandenburger was a photogrammetry expert who had discovered the missile bases in Cuba, during the Kennedy era.
An American team ran a day and a half expedition to the site, hardly enough time to carry out any scientific testing. They blew a hole in the side of the structure with dynamite, although some timber shaped stones were revealed, their conclusion was, "Nothing of any archaeological interest". If this object was Noah's Ark, it would be approximately 4400 years old so the wood would have petrified. So finding timber shaped stone was encouraging evidence. However, because the material had no growth rings, the team decided it could not be wood. But does this really prove true?The conditions of the world before the Biblical flood, were very different from now. The Bible says, "...for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth...But there went up a mist from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground." (Gen 2: 5, 6). Growth rings in wood are caused by seasonal variations, so in a pre flood environment, with no seasonal variations, the trees would have no growth rings. And this is exactly what the American team found! In fact, if the material did have growth rings, it could not have been Noah's Ark.After seeing an article published in LIFE magazine covering the expedition, Ron Wyatt an amateur archaeologist, visited the site in 1977. His interest was aroused and he decided the structure deserved further investigation as to whether this could be Noah's Ark.
It lay 6,300 feet above sea level, much too high to be the remains of a boat from a local flood. It is over 200 miles from the nearest sea. The dimensions were consistent with the Biblical description of Noah's Ark in Gen. 6:15, measuring 300 cubits long. The width was greater than that mentioned in the Bible as the sides of the boat had splayed, which would be expected in a boat of that age.
Ground penetrating radar proved the boat to have three decks, the top two decks had collapsed leaving the bottom deck intact which contained 144 rooms. Walls, cavities, a door near the front, ramps, and two large round 'tank shapes' near to the bow were also located. The radar scan revealed four protrusions extending from the stern that were probably stabilizers.
Ron tested the material at Galbraith Laboratories in Knoxville, Tennessee and it proved to be laminated, petrified wood. Tests for carbon showed that samples from the site contained much higher carbon content than the surrounding area. The specimen from the site proved to be 4.95% carbon, while the specimen from the surrounding area, tested at 1.88%. Thus the specimen from the site had once been living matter. Such sophisticated alloys as iron, titanium and aluminium also proved to be present. With only a superficial inspection the rib timbers and deck joists are clearly visible along the entire length of the ship.
With the use of four types of different metal detectors, thousands of metal rivets were found on the site. Iron was found at regular intervals which made up a pattern of horizontal and vertical lines 'criss-crossing' the boat, demonstrating iron at the levels of each bulkhead. Conventional science teaches that the iron age far precedes the time of the flood, but the Bible in Genesis 4:22 says, "Tubalcain, [was] an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron". Iron nodules were also found in about 5400 places, which show linear patterns consistent with the shape of the hull.
In 1991, Greg Brewer, found a petrified antler in the side of the ark. As a result of a core drilling Ron found extinct rodent hair, petrified animal droppings and red human hair.All the expeditions have so far been to Mt. Ararat, but what does the Bible actually say about the resting place of Noah's Ark? Gen 8:4, "And the ark rested on the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. The Bible does not say the ark came to rest on Mt. Ararat, but on the mountain range of Ararat. That is exactly where we find this boat shaped object, it is located about fifteen miles south of Mt. Ararat.The names of the surrounding places are interestingly associated with the Biblical account of the flood. The valley is called 'The Valley of Eight', in reference to the eight survivors of the flood, Noah and his wife, their three sons and their wives. A village in the valley translates to 'The Village of Eight', where several giant anchor stones can be found thousands of feet above sea level and hundreds of kilometers from the nearest sea. On the anchor stones there are carved Christian crosses from the crusader period, evidence that the crusaders also recognized the Christian significance of the anchor stones. There are thirteen of these anchor stones that all lie in direct line with the boat. So evidently, Noah cut them loose as the waters subsided and just before the ark came to rest.
Near to this village is another smaller village with a name that translates to 'The Crow will not Stand'. Undoubtedly, referring to when Noah released a raven from the ark. Another village is called 'Where the Oars were Reversed', again suggesting that a boat once passed over this area, where it began to slow down to its final resting place. The Turkish government has also sent their own archaeological team, who recovered four intact metal rods, each about four foot long. These are now in the possession of the Ministry of Mines and Minerals, in Turkey. They have officially dedicated the site as a national park declaring it to be the remains of Noah's Ark!
Click Here For More Information on Noah's Ark
|
61
posted on
04/16/2002 5:01:25 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
To: Good Tidings Of Great Joy
Wouldn't it be funny if they scooped away the snow and found.....
To: LostTribe
">The Gilgamesh story was the same [ ... ] flood story.( told by two different groups."Yep, I think so too.
Ah.... Do you think the Black Sea Flood was in fact, Noah's Flood? ..and if not, what do you think was?
63
posted on
04/16/2002 5:19:57 PM PDT
by
blam
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; junior; longshadow; crevo_list;
RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman...
Swammi alert! Could it be the Face On Mars? Or the Zit On Uranus? No, it's Noah's Ark!
To: PatrickHenry
Or the Zit On Uranus? All this stuff, whether it be "Noah's Ark" or the "Butt on Mars" artifact, just cracks me up. Since everybody has already seen photos of the "Old Man of the Mountain" in NH as an example of a naturally occuring phenomonon that has the appearance of being man-made, I'll skip it and go to something different:
Try doing a search on the "Giant's Causeway" a "genuine" (wink-wink) "staircase" used by "Giants" to walk from Scotland to Northern Ireland.
I'll bet no one can prove Giants DIDN'T use it!
To: lexcorp
......."with the old serial numbers scraped off......"
AW, C'MON__ are you trying to imply that the "Ancient 'Truth-Tellers'" would LIE to us???
HEAVEN FORFEND!!!
STILL, there are a LOT of "Historical Anomalies" scattered around our World; ALL of them DEMANDING an explanation devoid of "Conjecture & Slippery Logic!"
There is MUCH in the past history of our Species which is unexplained, & HIGHLY CONTRADICTORY of the "accepted Story" of our Species "Time" on Earth!
The "Historical Anomalies" NEED TO BE RESOLVED, if we are EVER to know WHO WE ARE!!
Doc
To: PatrickHenry
On some other thread, the Ark was announced as being at "the 13,000 foot level." This time, it's more like 15,000 feet. Anyway, I was intrigued enough to do the math for how much additional water all over the earth it would take to float a boat to 13000 feet. It was, IIRC, a bit more than a doubling of the published figure for the hydrosphere we have now.
Fifteen thousand feet adds a lot more water.
To: VadeRetro
Fifteen thousand feet adds a lot more water. So what? When you're in the miracle business, what difference does that make? In for a dime, in for a dollar.
To: lexcorp
Not if it is buried in snow 14,000 feet up. Also, we are to believe what God said because He said it. we are not supposed to tust physical things, although we do have physicals things that testify to what He has done.
I would LOVE to see the Ark, but I am required to believe in it by faith, not by archaelogy. Still, I think it might be, mainly because Genesis is not myth, it is fact.
To: longshadow
"Try doing a search on the "Giant's Causeway" a "genuine" (wink-wink) "staircase" used by "Giants" to walk from Scotland to Northern Ireland. " The 'Giants Causeway' is a natural phenomenon.
70
posted on
04/16/2002 6:49:12 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
>Ah.... Do you think the Black Sea Flood was in fact, Noah's Flood? ..and if not, what do you think was?
Sorry, I'm not ready to make that link. ggg. But it sure is interesting...
To: PatrickHenry ; VadeRetro
I think you are leaving out some of the options.
1) Displacement of ocean waters could cover the inhabited world and it could take a year for the water to drain back into the ocean, especially if the ship was over flat ground like Mesopotamia. You don't need twice as much water, you just move the water you have over the land. This could come from many sources, including well-placed meteorites or bubbling up of the compressed methane on the ocean floor.
2) The plate boundaries of the Earth contain oceans full of water, if ever they "belched" it back up, their WOULD be obout double the water in the oceans. I don't know of any mechanism that might do this, but the account does say that 'the fountains of the great deep were broken up" in addition to the 40 days of rain.
I DON'T Think it happened 4,000 years ago, or even 7,500, but I don't think a world-wide (as they knew it) flood catastrophe that almost extincted the human race can be ruled out.
72
posted on
04/16/2002 7:46:19 PM PDT
by
Ahban
To: blam
The 'Giants Causeway' is a natural phenomenon. No! It was built by Giants so they could walk more easily from Scotland to Ireland......
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gods, Graves, Glyphs.
74
posted on
04/16/2002 8:26:47 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Helen
Isn't that one of the stones from Easter Island?
To: RightWhale
Did I ever tell you about the idea that the flood occurred on another planet, probably Mars, a long, long time ago, and the Ark was an interplanetary ship carrying the survivors to earth?You're stealing medved's material!
To: blam;Gods, Graves, Glyphs;
To: lexcorp
lions and tigers and Tasmanian wolves, Oh, My.
78
posted on
04/17/2002 4:01:35 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
Comment #79 Removed by Moderator
To: wasfree
wouldn't that produce coal The newest coal beds were formed 10,000,000 years ago.
The oldest 400,000,000 years ago.
Even the "new" coal beds predate by 9,992,500 years
the localized black sea flood.
See the World Coal Institute website
80
posted on
04/17/2002 7:09:49 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson