Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWBaral
Look at the "AIDS awareness workshop" that was brought to Chelmsford, MA without parental notification (from the lawsuit against Hot, Sexy, and Safer Productions, 1996):

1) [Landolphi] told the students that they were going to have a 'group sexual experience, with audience participation'; 2) [Landolphi] used profane, lewd, and lascivious language to describe body parts and excretory functions; 3) [Landolphi] advocated and approved oral sex, masturbation, homosexual sexual activity, and condom use during promiscuous premarital sex; 4) [Landolphi] simulated masturbation; 5) [Landolphi] characterized the loose pants worn by one minor as 'erection wear'; 6) [Landolphi] referred to being in 'deep sh--' after anal sex; 7) [Landolphi] had a male minor lick an oversized condom with her, after which she had a female minor pull it over the male minor's entire head and blow it up; 8) [Landolphi] encouraged a male minor to display his 'orgasm face' with her for the camera; 9) [Landolphi] informed a male minor that he was not having enough orgasms; 10) [Landolphi] closely inspected a minor and told him he had a 'nice butt'; and 11) [Landolphi] made [Landolphi] made eighteen references to orgasms, six references to male genitals, and eight references to female genitals.(30)

Paper here. I've heard the audio tape that the court heard and this doesn't even begin to convey the obscenity of the presentation. For example, this paragraph left out her graphic description of female masturbation over a mirror on the floor.

See how CNN covered the story:

Supreme Court upholds sex education program

March 4, 1996

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Supreme Court decisions issued Monday uphold a Massachusetts high school's sex education program, permit workers in an Iowa case to pray at work and support prosecutors using the seizure of property as a crime-fighting tool.

Justices ruled against a company sued for the effects of toxic Agent Orange.

Sex education

Without comment, the court refused to hear an appeal by parents and two former students at a Massachusetts high school who objected to what they considered an "indecent" [you gotta love the scare quotes] program on sex education and AIDS.

The court left intact a ruling that said the 90-minute program featured at a school assembly did not violate religious freedom or parents' right to rear their children as they see fit.

The action ends the two families' federal court attempt to collect $3.5 million from Chelmsford, Massachusetts, school officials and Suzi Landolphi, owner of the Hot, Sexy and Safer production company. A state lawsuit still is pending.

10 posted on 04/19/2002 7:20:42 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan; LarryLied
Thanks for bringing out some of the practices in Mass. Somewhere in my 'archives' I have more info on Mass 'educational' practices, where 'retreats' actually physically molested children [in a way I cannot - and would not - describe.] Anyone revealing those practices [like the tape you mentioned] were subject to prosecution.

I'm not surprised that such practices have spread to Vermont - America's first communist state.

The bottom line is - however - that such practices could not continue if parents fought to shut them down. The truth is that Mass and Vermont have separated themselves from the American mainstream [and NY and Cal not far behind], and need to be dealt with.

Given the horrors of Senator Jeffords and Senator Leahey, I'm thinking of making a bumper sticker calling from the removal of Vermont from the Union.

16 posted on 04/20/2002 6:23:16 AM PDT by B Ireland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson