Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wednesday, 4/24, Market WrapUp
Financial Sense Online ^ | 4/24/2002 | James J. Puplava

Posted on 04/24/2002 3:39:02 PM PDT by rohry

 
Weekday Commentary from Jim Puplava
Home

AOL Time Warner Reports
$54 Billion Loss

The Week in Graphs

4/12 Storm Watch Update

4/05 Storm Watch Update  

 Wednesday's Market Scoreboard
 April 24, 2002
 Dow Industrials 58.81 10,030.43
 Dow Utilities 0.57 310.18
 Dow Transports 23.31 2674.74
 S & P 500 7.82 1093.14
 Nasdaq 16.95 1713.34
 US Dollar to Yen 129.64
 US Dollar to Euro

.8928

 Gold 0.2 304.8
 Silver 0.008 4.562
 Oil 0.24 26.38
 CRB Index 0.01 201.01
 Natural Gas

0.172 3.419

All market indexes

Storm Watch
Geopolitical News in Focus
Energy Resource Page

Precious Metals


Guest Editorial 4/12
Dr. Sam T. Cohen & Dr. Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.
The Rogue Nuclear Threat

 

J. R. Nyquist
FSO Global Analysis
Fear and Trembling in the Middle East


Jim Puplava's NEW Perspectives Series 
Part 1: Hubbert's Peak & The Economics of Oil
NOW ONLINE

 Market WrapUp for the Week 
Monday  l  Tuesday  l  Wednesday  l  Thursday  l  Friday


Wednesday's Stock Market WrapUp

MIXED MESSAGES

The much-heralded second half recovery is starting to amass a few more critics. The army of disbelievers is starting to grow. If the recovery is supposed to be on track, it certainly isn’t showing up in the numbers. The plethora of earnings reports over these last few weeks is turning out to be less than stellar. In fact, many now question whether Wall Street has been much too optimistic and premature in forecasting an earnings turn around. Instead of a 7-8% downturn in earnings this past quarter, it looks like that number will be closer to 11-12% before this reporting season is over. Companies reporting so far have given no indication that things are about to miraculously improve this quarter. The best that can be said is the downturn in profits this quarter isn’t as bad as the last quarter. Therefore, things must be getting better.

The problems for the stock market lie in market valuations. At the moment they are priced at perfection. Price earnings multiples of 45-60 imply growth rates that are unachievable in today’s highly competitive market. Companies are saddled with high debt, which has increased interest expense eating into the bottom line. In addition to higher labor, raw material, and energy costs, companies lack pricing power in the marketplace. This limits their ability to recoup rising prices thereby reducing profit margins. In addition to lower profit potential the inherent risks in the market place is causing risk premiums to rise with investors demanding a higher return to compensate for additional risks. This translates into lower PE multiples for the same dollar in earnings. The market is resolute in its punishment of companies who fail to deliver high potential earnings growth. This is very much evident in the fall in the markets generals.

The large cap stocks that led the 90’s bull market have all fallen on hard times. If you look at any graph of the market leaders such as IBM, GE, Microsoft, Cisco, and Dell, one thing is obvious -- market capitalization has fallen precipitously. With falling market caps and closer scrutiny of financial statements, companies have been deprived of their main source for growing earnings, which is rising stock prices. In the past, rising market caps reflected in inflated stock prices allowed companies to use their stock as currency for making acquisitions. This became a dependable source of earnings growth. The ability to buy sales and earnings became the chief engine for growth during the final boom years of the 90’s bull market.

Those acquisitions are now starting to come home to roost as one company after another is forced to write off those expensive acquisitions through impairment charges. In addition to higher interest rate expense impairment charges is one of the main factors hurting earnings this year. Without the ability to acquire earnings and with financial engineering now frowned upon by analysts and regulators, an important source of earnings growth has been removed from the market. This makes Wall Street consensus estimates highly suspect. There aren’t any catalysts around that would create the miracles imbedded in the Street’s second half recovery. In fact, the possibility for improvement in earnings has already dissipated. In the last recession, earnings rose slowly until the Fed brought down interest rates. As rates fell, companies refinanced their debt, lowering interest rate costs. This contributed to the boost in profits during the early part of the decade following the 1991 recession.

This option has already been exploited during the unprecedented interest rate cuts of last year. As the Fed cut the federal funds rate 11 times, companies used the opportunity to refinance their debt. In many cases, companies also took on more debt as cash flows dried up from a lack of real profits. Instead of unloading debt, companies actually took on new debt, adding additional interest expenses on to the income statement. The current high level of debt has been one of the main reasons profits have been so dismal outside of the impairment charges from writing off goodwill.

Today was another example of the earnings woes facing major companies. AOL Time Warner reported a loss of $54.2 billion, the biggest in US history, in costs associated with its purchase of Time Warner last year. The loss was up from the $.37 billion the company lost the year before. AOL’s monstrous loss was followed by AT&T, which reported its fifth consecutive quarterly loss. The biggest long-distance telephone company said its losses widened during the current quarter to $975 million from $192 million a year ago. Sales slipped 11% for the fifth consecutive quarter. The company went on to say that long-distance sales would decline by 20% this year. AT&T’s CEO, Michael Armstrong, is trying to pare back the debt from his reckless acquisition spree and prepare the company for a possible sale. It is likely the company may not survive the year before it is sold off to a much stronger and well-capitalized competitor.

Jean Marie Messier, the CEO of Vivendi Universal, faced angry shareholders and protestors at the company’s annual shareholder meeting. The company reported a record loss for 2001 because of acquisitions made over the last year. Shareholders have seen their share price drop over 38% as investors have lost confidence in management’s strategy to boost earnings.

Tensions in the Middle East persist, and the crisis in Argentina is far from being over. Argentine President Duhalde may fix the exchange rate bid for the Argentine peso in an effort to avert a banking collapse. Setting the rate at 3.5 peso’s per dollar would make it more difficult for Argentina to get $20 billion in IMF aid. The government is refusing to cut spending, change labor laws, or take steps to cut the government’s deficit. The government refuses to go on a diet and is looking for outside money to continue its profligate spending.

On the economic front, it looks like the recovery is starting to stall. On Wednesday several economic reports show mixed signs for the economy. Durable goods fell by 0.6% last month versus an expected increase of 0.1%. Excluding heavy spending on defense by government, durable goods actually fell by 1.2%. While inventory levels continue to be worked down, there is no sign on the horizon that businesses are increasing their spending. If it wasn’t for defense spending by government, the declines each month over the last few quarters would be much greater.

Another report out today showed new home sales fell in March following a big surge in February. The Commerce Department reported new home sales fell by 3.1% last month to an annual rate of 878,000 units. Although the sale of new homes is getting softer, economists still hold on to beliefs that the housing sector will remain strong throughout the year. However, experts don’t agree. The pace and sale of new construction isn’t sustainable.

The plethora of worries from earnings to Middle East tensions caused an early morning rally to fizzle. At the end of the day all the major indexes were in the red. The tech-laden Nasdaq came close to hitting a six month low. Volume was moderate with 1.35 billion shares traded on the NYSE and 1.88 billion on the Nasdaq. Market breadth was negative with losers beating out winners by 16 to 15 on the New York Stock Exchange and by a wider 19 to 16 margin on the Nasdaq. Just about all sectors pulled back today led by natural gas, oil, retail and paper. The only standout was airlines, which rose on analysts’ upgrades.

Treasury Market
Government bonds rallied after a tentative start, with the morning's softer-than-expected data giving investors a reason to bid up fixed-income securities. The 10-year Treasury note advanced 14/32 to yield 5.105% and the 30-year government bond rose 22/32 to yield 5.615%.

Overseas Market
European stocks fell, led by Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. and other oil companies, which dropped with crude. Ericsson and Nokia Oyj slid for the fifth day amid concern about demand for their phone equipment and handsets. The Dow Jones Stoxx 50 Index fell for the fifth day, dropping 12.84 points, or 0.4% to 3555.03. Only three of the eight major European markets were up during today’s trading.

Japanese stocks fell led by Tokyo Electron Ltd. on mounting signs that upcoming earnings from major computer related companies won't justify the 25% they gained as a group in the past 11 weeks. The Nikkei 225 stock average fell 0.5% to 11,672.88. The Topix index lost 0.5% to 1098.72.

© Copyright, Jim Puplava, April 24, 2002



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: economy; investments; stockmarket
The MSNBC crowd was still trying to figure out the AOL bottom line one hour after the company's filing...
1 posted on 04/24/2002 3:39:02 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sinkspur;bvw;Tauzero;robnoel;kezekiel;ChadGore;Harley - Mississippi;Dukie;Matchett-PI;Moonman62...
Market Wrap is delivered...
2 posted on 04/24/2002 3:40:13 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rohry
The current high level of debt has been one of the main reasons profits have been so dismal outside of the impairment charges from writing off goodwill.

With corp debt so high, I can't help but thinking that companies will be working for the bondholders not the shareholders. Maybe corp and junk bonds are the place to be.

Richard W.

3 posted on 04/24/2002 3:55:10 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Only a Dr. Pangloss could find a bright side to the earnings coming out. The big caps are a disaster in the process of self-destruction. The only hope is the small caps and commodity related stocks such as precious metals which usually lead us out of a "depression."

The bigger story may be the "bubble" Alan Greenspan denies but what appears to exist in the residential real estate market. Freddie, Fannie and Alan have pumped up the mortgage market with cheap money. Only time will tell, but what usually happens as interest rates begin to increase, properties go under water, they are abandoned and banks and other lenders follow suit.

President Bush and this Administration have incipient problems which can only result in the sacking of Alan Greenspan at some point down the line.

4 posted on 04/24/2002 4:25:24 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I don't think Bush has the authority to sack Alan Greenspan.
5 posted on 04/24/2002 4:29:25 PM PDT by Edmund Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Apparently, there is no bottom to AOL's bottom line...they're still probing with a long stick!
6 posted on 04/24/2002 4:36:11 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
The bigger story may be the "bubble" Alan Greenspan denies but what appears to exist in the residential real estate market.

Agreed, which is why I am renting after 25 years of home ownership...

7 posted on 04/24/2002 4:46:50 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
It figures, I get fed up and cover my short positions just before the market does the big swan dive. Oh well.

However, I must say that I find it hard to believe that the market has held up as well as it has so far. The Naz should be somewhere around 1400 right now, and that would be charitable. There is obviously a whole lot of money out there that is willing to buy up stocks at "bargain" prices. However, considering current P/E ratios, it's really hard to figure out just what these bargains are supposed to be.

8 posted on 04/24/2002 5:36:33 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
The Naz should be somewhere around 1400 right now, and that would be charitable.

Yeah, I would say 650 would be more realistic...

9 posted on 04/24/2002 6:27:54 PM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
It's the more or less automatic 401(k) money that is slowing the slide. I know people -- otherwise bright people -- who have basically stopped following their 401(k)s (because they find it depressing,) and yet haven't adjusted their deferments.
10 posted on 04/24/2002 6:33:03 PM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rohry
bump
11 posted on 04/24/2002 7:10:28 PM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
The housing market never ceases to confound me. Granted, interest rates are low, but consider this: real estate taxes and school taxes are constantly on the rise; there have been endless reports of massive corporate layoffs for the past two years; the financial markets have plunged (making home buyers feel less wealthy); personal savings rates have turned negative--feel free to add your own. Plus, just as a stock that sells for $100 per share with no positive earnings in sight is objectively overvalued, a three bed room 1950s ranch house on a quarter acre of back-filled swamp land in a historically middle-class town is manifestly overpriced at $350,000. I think we're witnessing a version of a Ponzi scheme and the suckers who borrow $300,000 to buy the $350,000 ranch in my example are about to get burned.
12 posted on 04/24/2002 8:08:29 PM PDT by Atticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Thanks! Bump!
13 posted on 04/24/2002 9:28:19 PM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Thanks! for the post.
14 posted on 04/24/2002 9:33:21 PM PDT by LocDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rohry
From yesterday's thread: Does this, therefore, mean that the Intels, Motorolas, IBMs and TIs are betting on a 2004 recovery

The people I deal with make elements used in the tooling - wafer steppers, mask alignment tools, etc. Their customers are KLA-Tencor, Applied Materials, etc. Capital expenditures for 300mm wafer tooling is being deferred since it seems that current & near term projected chip demand can be satisfied by 200 & 150mm tooling.The way I read it is that some increased chip demand could be met with current equipment since the existing tooling is not running at full capacity. However the efficiencies & yield increase from the larger wafers suggest that the mfgs. would want to be ready to go when their markets begin to turn. So, it may not be as late as 2004 but it seems that the wait for the humming economy will be in the 2nd half of 2003.

I saw that yesterday's decline in capital equipment purchases did not include semiconductor related equipment. First time that has been left out of the report. Would its inclusion have painted too bleak a picture for the markets to sustain ??

15 posted on 04/25/2002 5:47:27 AM PDT by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rohry
I am thinking about that course myself. Good news about the U.S. and deflation is that there are so many long-term contracts that it takes a while to wind through the system. There is still time to reverese the deflation so we don't have to experience a collapse in real estate prices. However, with Greenspan at the helm it will never happen.
16 posted on 04/25/2002 6:36:09 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dukie
Another thing about the semi-conductor sector, is that even with increased demand, price pressures are too big to overcome. Demand not only has to increase, it has to increase by enough to offset the declining prices. That is a tough road. From Don Luskin at TrendMacrolytics -
When repeatedly questioned on catalysts to resurgent demand, Intel's spokesmen had to keep saying that there weren't any. The mythical corporate upgrade cycle? "If you're asking whether I can see a sign of that, no I can't." Pent-up demand? "We'll just have to see." Confident about the coming quarter? "We'll have to see what happens in terms of final demand." Can you have a normal seasonal second half without a pickup in corporate sales? "Yes, if demand in Japan picks up."

17 posted on 04/25/2002 6:40:47 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rohry
I lived through the Real Estate Bubble of 80's Houston, been there, done that, got the T-shirt on my back and a gimmie cap left.


18 posted on 04/25/2002 6:59:57 AM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch
Good observation, Wyatt. I worked for a Cleveland based fortune 500 industrial equipment mfg. whose stock has been advancing in the face of this down market and it seems that the only reason for the rise is relative performnce - i.e. they're not doing as bad as others in the sector and they're maintaiaing the dividend by cost cutting ( layoffs, etc. )
19 posted on 04/25/2002 11:57:42 AM PDT by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson