It was an 'accident' that could not be explained. But they tried to explain it anyway.
Unfortunately, you and most others bought the government cover story.
I STRONGLY resent your cavalier remark.
Frankly, the fact that there was no conclusive evidence in any direction makes it a matter that I could not, and still can't, make an informed opinion of... Like the other 90% out here... I don't think anybody would question the fact that it was a tragedy, and would have received far more attention were the WTC/Pentagon attacks not eclipsing the whole thing, with regard to both the number of dead/wounded/missing, or the cold calculation such a terrorist attack requires...
You might want to back off, a little. Some of us are waiting for more factual evidence, before making comments... Making rash assumptions (as you are currently doing) make the rest of us look like the stereotypical conspiracy-theorists...