[anniegetyourgun]

Oddly enough they aren't anywhere to be found on the "House Plans To Send Borders Bill" thread either. Must be busy digging up something to post in order to start yet another Bush-bashing thread. After all, it's not a good day for them unless they can post at least two dozen, making some stuff up in the process.

[alnick]

I didn't see any of them on the ICC threads early this morning when I was reading those either.

[MJY1288]

I didn't see any of them on ICC bill thread either

[mlibertarianj]

Sorry to disappoint you, but if W does something right I will support him, as this is the case. But if he does wrong I call him on it also. Isn't amazing how the first admendment works, especially when sacred cows get gored? My loyalty is to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA not to who is running it, whether it is GW or Clinton (amazing isn't it, I was once called a Clinton basher when he was in office, not that I put GW anywhere near that scoundrel). If this soothes you, I haven't decided to vote against GW in '04, since he has two years left, and generally think that he is doing a decent job, but I will leave it to my decision, whether to vote for him and not drink Kool-Aid, just because Rush, Sean or others deemed it so!

[MileHi]

Bush bashers? I don't know either. This is a good thing no doubt. However W signed CFR and the so-called Patriot Act. I don't call criticizing that bashing if that is your implication. Hell, blind aligience ain't my style.