Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gradual Genocide: Fertility, Feminism And Fascism
ToogoodReports ^ | May 8, 2002 | Henry Makow Ph.D.

Posted on 05/08/2002 12:47:57 PM PDT by Starmaker

A smoking gun! The elite doesn't want us to reproduce.

In 1970, Frederick Jaffe, the VP of Rockefeller-sponsored "Planned Parenthood" organization outlined how "social constraints" should be used to achieve "fertility control." ("Family Planning Perspectives" Oct.1970.)

These "constraints" included encouraging "increased homosexuality," altering "the image of the ideal family," and encouraging women to work outside the home.

If this failed, the agency recommended the placement of "fertility control agents in the water supply." We're not talking about unwanted pregnancies here.

The unprecedented decline of the American family since 1960 did not take place by accident. We are victims of a campaign of psychological warfare carried out by the CIA and foundations through the media, government and education.

They put the neutering agent in the cultural drinking water. The main ingredient is the promotion of homosexuality as an alternative to heterosexuality.

Feminism, which masquerades as "woman's rights," is in fact a pathological lesbian movement. It coerces women to believe that their feminine instincts are socially taught, oppressive and evil. It teaches them to fear and compete with men, and to find fulfillment in career instead of family.

Women who devote their lives to their families are the finest aspects of human life. They are saints who bring love and beauty into the world and tend to the real everyday needs of men and children. To disparage these women is a foul, vicious calumny worthy of the devil himself. Yet that's what the feminist movement is all about, though they deny it.

Betty Frieden, the "moderate" feminist founder, who hid the fact that she was a Communist activist, compared homemakers to concentration camp victims. Simone de Beauvoir, another Communist founder, said women must not be given a choice to be mothers and homemakers because they'll choose that option.

According to feminist Ellen Willis, feminism "is the cutting edge of a revolution in cultural and moral values...The objective of every feminist reform, from legal abortion...to child-care programs, is to undermine traditional family values." (The Nation, Nov. 14, 1981)

What part of traditional family values do feminists object to? Love? Sacrifice? Devotion? Loyalty? Security? The preparation of a new generation for life?

THEY'RE NOT CALLED FEMINAZIS FOR NOTHING

Rockefeller financed the Nazis through I.G. Farben. He sponsored the American Eugenics Society that had close links to its Nazi counterpart.

Rockefeller financed Alfred Kinsey, the homosexual pederast whose "Kinsey Report" replaced married love with casual sex.

Rockefeller continues to finance "Women's Studies" which is a training ground for fascist zealots who spread their poison in society as "change agents." (See Daphne Patai, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.)

The elite is promoting homosexuality to bring about a fascist New World Order. Homosexuality is a developmental disorder characterized by a failure to bond with a member of the opposite sex. Lesbianism (feminism) which coerces women to be like men (and vice-versa) makes it difficult to achieve such a bond. As a result, millions of men and women have been defrauded of happiness and suffer the same symptoms as homosexuals, i.e. arrested development, and obsession with sex.

The elite's purpose is to transfer power from the nation state to their minions at the world level. Once our democratic power is gone, the elite will lower the standard of living. Look at the economic disparities in the Third World for a blueprint of the future. For the elite, the motto is "the less there is of you, the more there is for us."

A distracted, dysfunctional population, deprived of its history and culture, will not recognize its fate in time. Men, emasculated and demoralized, will not be able to resist.

FROM ROCKEFELLER CENTER TO WINNIPEG SQUARE

I ran headlong into this stealth elite policy when I was teaching English part-time at the University of Winnipeg. I was exploring the subject of male-female love in works by DH Lawrence, Chekhov and Henry James.

A handful of militant feminists objected to my defense of traditional femininity and wrote a letter slandering me. Constance Rooke, the university president, accepted their allegations without investigation. The university ignored my complaint of discrimination. The Manitoba Human Rights Commission, another feminist bastion, also dismissed my complaint without investigation.

Winnipeg Sun Editor Lyn Cockburn portrayed me as a 50-year-old man who got his jollies by importuning his 18-year-old female students after class with questions about their sex lives. She compared me to a MD who should be disbarred for making "inappropriate remarks and gestures" to a young female patient. I am suing The Winnipeg Sun for defamation in court this week.

Vile slander is the lot of anyone who questions feminist dogma. Professors are afraid to speak to me.

This case is not about protecting innocence.

Last year, Cockburn had nothing to say when the same university was on the front page of The Winnipeg Sun for teaching lesbian masturbation to 14-year-old high school girls. The girls signed on for a summer school course on "women in the arts" and received an introduction to lesbianism instead. They learned that they didn't need men and could use bananas and vegetables. President Rooke was unrepentant but opined that it may have been too early to introduce the girls to this subject.

Normally Rooke would have lost her job for this outrage. But there wasn't a peep from the Minister of Education or other stalwarts of the community. Rooke is brazen because her orders come right from the top.

This became clear when I saw Jim Carr, the executive director of the Manitoba Business Council. I thought the province's leading enterprises would be concerned that feminists teach the hatred of males, the overthrow of capitalism and discrimination in favor of women, minorities and homosexuals.

He denied this is happening. Carr's previous assignment was biographer of Duff Roblin. A former Manitoba Premier, Roblin is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (the elite's US coordinating body.)

Hartley Richardson, a longtime leader of the Manitoba business community, is a member of the Trilateral Commission. Rockefeller interests set up these bodies to promote elite world government and (Canadian PM) Jean Chretien and (Manitoba Premier) Gary Doer dance to their tunes.

In conclusion, elite planners and their stooges (in government, education and the media) are actively promoting homosexuality in order to destabilize and neuter us. Their ultimate goal is to steal our birthright, in every sense of the word.

To comment on this article or express your opinion directly to the author, you are invited to e-mail Henry at scruples@escape.ca .


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: henrymakow; skinheadsonfr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2002 12:47:58 PM PDT by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
I understand your hatred for these things, but your reasoning is way off. The CIA isn't out to turn us in to homosexuals for the sake of ZPG, yada, yada, yada. This kind of far out thinking is the same as the wackos that are using their prejudice and unfortuanetly the current trend of politically correctness to hurt you and further themselves. I could address each of your issues, but hopefully you understand what I mean and I don't really want to waste the time. I do wish you good luck against the heinous acts brought against you.
2 posted on 05/08/2002 1:03:45 PM PDT by THROW?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
This is supposed to be a surprise?
3 posted on 05/08/2002 1:04:42 PM PDT by DuncanWaring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
(Tinfoil alert)
4 posted on 05/08/2002 1:05:19 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Starmaker
Feminism is evil and totalitarian and against the natural order as you describe it BUT this article confuses it with the sexual revolution they aren;t the same I have yet to meet a slut feminist sluts like men by definition feminist hate men by definition.
6 posted on 05/08/2002 1:15:23 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Women who devote their lives to their families are the finest aspects of human life. They are saints who bring love and beauty into the world and tend to the real everyday needs of men and children. To disparage these women is a foul, vicious calumny worthy of the devil himself. Yet that's what the feminist movement is all about, though they deny it.

This is NOT what the feminist movement is all about. Some feminists may be about undermining family, but not even close to a majority are. This is a bald faced lie. Get your facts straight.

Anyone, from the Right or the Left who wishes to limit women in any way, are nothing more than fascists who believe women are sub-human. This makes BOTH radical feminists AND radical fundementalists allies in the crime of using women as pawns to their political agenda. It makes them both NAZIS declaring that they have the right to tell others how to live, no doubt even to whether they are allowed to live, if we let the NAZIS from either side prevail.

Unfortunately, both extremes miscalculated. The vast majority of women are will not be fooled by either NAZI extremist position which attempts to dehumanize women by proposing that women HAVE TO CONFORM to their agenda. Women will refuse to conform en masse to anyone's agenda, no matter what it is.

Words cannot express the contempt I have for anyone who would try to co-opt woman's humanity, her free will and her individual autonomy in any way whatsoever. Both sides are the vilest anti-human hatemongers on the planet.

Telling women what to do and what to do, how to think, and what to hope for in her life is nothing short of declaring her a sub-human entity. It won't be tolerated by women no matter which side it comes from.
7 posted on 05/08/2002 1:34:08 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Last year, Cockburn had nothing to say when the same university was on the front page of The Winnipeg Sun for teaching lesbian masturbation to 14-year-old high school girls.

What the hell is "lesbian masturbation"? Masturbation is a solitary pursuit. By the way, I agree we don't need to be teaching young people either boys or girls how to masturbate. The vast majority of them will figure it out on their own, so this is a waste of resources.
8 posted on 05/08/2002 1:38:35 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
The vast majority of feminists do not hate me. You are wrong, wrong, wrong about that. I find it hard to believe that even most lesbians would "hate" men. Only stupid bigotted people "hate" others collectively. Granted there are some stupid biggoted people, but fortunately they are greatly outnumbered by reasonable people.
9 posted on 05/08/2002 1:42:38 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weikel
correction: The vast majority of feminists do not hate men. You are wrong, wrong, wrong about that. I find it hard to believe that even most lesbians would "hate" men. Only stupid bigotted people "hate" others collectively. Granted there are some stupid biggoted people, but fortunately they are greatly outnumbered by reasonable people.
10 posted on 05/08/2002 1:46:01 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
They do at least on a subconscious level. I turned a date down with a pretty girl recently because the feminazis at her former liberal arts school brainwashed her well enough( thats my theory anyway she doesn't seem like a natural feminist). Right before when talking about a paper we all have to do( stupid humanties requirement) with her friends she mentioned that she was doing a women's right papaer( I was shocked) then I got asked out a little later in the conversation I said no. All feminist hate men on at least on a subconscious level hatred of men and for the natural order is at the core of feminism.
11 posted on 05/08/2002 1:53:56 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hobey Baker
"Why do these elites not want us to reproduce?"

Because they read these posted articles and say enough is enough?

12 posted on 05/08/2002 2:05:09 PM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
(Tinfoil alert)

With the CIA, Rockefeller, Simone de Beauvoir, the Trilateral Commission, and the American Eugenics Society all in one article, what makes you think that?
13 posted on 05/08/2002 2:14:44 PM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: weikel
All feminist hate men on at least on a subconscious level hatred of men and for the natural order is at the core of feminism.

Your parochial experiences notwithstanding, you are wrong. The only thing REAL feminists hate is being dictated to on the basis of being female. REAL feminists, and real women for that matter, insist on being treated like responsible individual adults, not like children who must be told what to do and how to act. That's it. That's the "core" of feminism, nothing more, nothing less. It's really quite simple.

And it has nothing to do with hating men. People who hate men (or people who hate women) have their own separate problems. It has nothing to do with feminism or anything else. These people just need intense psychological help.

The author of this piece is engaging in collectivist demononizing of large groups of people based on scant personal experience. He is doing exactly what he claims "feminists" are doing! That makes him a hypocrite as well as ignorant of the facts.
14 posted on 05/08/2002 2:16:44 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Oh so you are a feminist god help us if we have feminist on FR.
15 posted on 05/08/2002 2:21:00 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Cutting down the western middle class is a necessary prerequisite to overthrowing the established order of things and instituting the New World Order.

This is all part of it.

Read up on GRAMSCI some time... the communists have given up their direct attack on western capitalism (e.g.- the US) and are now doing it through our children, or more correctly the children of the poor and maleable lower classes since the middle class is no longer reproducing.

Down here in Chile HBO Latin America is the pathfinder in promoting the family breakdown. The filth they show on that cable channel is UNBELIEVABLE, yet not a peep out of the conservative Catholic church... sigh

16 posted on 05/08/2002 2:26:13 PM PDT by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
Down here in Chile HBO Latin America is the pathfinder in promoting the family breakdown. The filth they show on that cable channel is UNBELIEVABLE, yet not a peep out of the conservative Catholic church... sigh

The filth shown on the non-cable channels was unbelivable 10 years ago. Remember the show "Donna Bella"? What are they showing now, hard-core porn?

a.cricket

17 posted on 05/08/2002 2:39:29 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
I can see it now--HBO executives having secret meetings with members of various supposedly scheming elite secret societies. Trade liberalization, a little bit of skin on HBO...yup, it's all connected and part of a secret plan. Yup.
18 posted on 05/08/2002 2:46:21 PM PDT by Redshift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: weikel
God help you indeed.
19 posted on 05/08/2002 2:48:51 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
With the CIA, Rockefeller, Simone de Beauvoir, the Trilateral Commission, and the American Eugenics Society all in one article, what makes you think that?

The grammar structure of the article itself.

20 posted on 05/08/2002 2:48:59 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson