Both were no doubt sickened to see the left in ascendancy at that time. Few things bug me more than the refusal of the left and Americans in general to acknowledge the complicity of many here in the crimes committed in the Soviet Union.
I tried to read the full text of the report, but my cmptr keep locking up. It looks to me unlikely there was and documented evidence against Judd. He had a nephew who lived in Canada who was a documented member. A janitor testified Judd's views were radical. He was in a debate and took the opposite side and argued so convincingly that it was determined he must have inside sources to the Communist party. He also wrote for a national magazine called "Society and Culture" which was a large contributor to the feeling Judd was a Communist. There were many unnamed sources, including a known Communist party member, but no solid documentation.
It seems unlikely from what I read that this evidence would stand up to any scrutiny. It appears the powers that be at CU were protecting the case because it was so weak.