Posted on 05/18/2002 9:55:51 AM PDT by Sabertooth
So that's it.....
Not only winning, the leauge has been interested in increasing offensive production ever since the player strike in the early seventies. Lowering of the mound, shortened fences, the new baseballs, and the tolerance of steroids are all consistant with that goal. The league is tougher on pitchers that scuff the baseball than those batters useing steroids
Yes he was, but he played in a Little league park. I grew up in Baltimore and watched Davy Johnson hit 15 homers a year for maybe 10 years. His first year in Atlanta after being traded he hit 42 home runs. Here's a mickey mantle quote.."if I played in Atlanta I would have hit 1000 home runs. My center field was 461 feet."
So, according to you logic, Bonds should be hitting FEWER home runs, not more.
Just look at photos, he's put on 25 pounds. Bonds has always been a great homerun hitter. Having lived in gyms for 20 years, I can assure you steriods reduces flexibility, I've seen it on countless guys. This is not an if A than B concerning Bonds. Bonds has the best eye in baseball, if its near the zone its out of the park, whether he's 180 pounds or 240. There are some abusers of roids in MLB, but Canseco is way off and probably cost himself a Hall of Fame shot.
Really?
As a kid playing sandlot, our field had a pond in right field and a "ponder" was a ground rule double, while both teams searched for the ball.
Hooray! I'm not getting fat, I've just been taking steroids without knowing it. Here that honey? I'm bulking up!
Bonds is listed at 228, that makes 33 pounds. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/baseball/mlb/players/1786/ No applause please.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.