Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror Threat To NYC Landmarks (Brooklyn Bridge and Statue of Liberty targeted)
CBS News Channel 2 ^ | 5/21/02

Posted on 05/21/2002 3:06:37 PM PDT by areafiftyone

The FBI warned officials in New York on Tuesday about uncorroborated information that landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty might be targeted by terrorists, a law enforcement official said.

The information, passed to the FBI's joint terrorism task force in New York, was based on interviews with detainees and was not independently confirmed, the official said.

Security was increased around monuments and landmarks after the warning was relayed to New York officials, the official said.

Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said earlier Tuesday that the NYPD was dealing very closely with federal authorities and said the department was prepared for "any eventuality." Kelly's comments came the day before Fleet Week 2002, an annual maritime celebration expected to draw 6,000 naval personnel.

Sailors, marines and Coast Guard personnel will be aboard 22 ships, including six warships. The public is invited aboard ships participating in the festival.

Kelly said he felt the department was "doing the best that we reasonably can do to prevent another incident and to respond if, God forbid, there is one."

Security zones are in place, forbidding vessels from operating within 150 yards of the United Nations, Ellis Island or Liberty Island. Also, no vessels can operate within 25 yards of bridge piers, abutments, tunnel ventilators or waterfront facilities.

At the Brooklyn Bridge on Tuesday afternoon, police officers checked vehicles at both the Brooklyn and Manhattan entrances of the bridge, though the bridge remained open to cars and pedestrians. Around City Hall, there was also a heightened police presence.

On Tuesday, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he didn't see any reason why people shouldn't enjoy Fleet Week and other activities over the weekend.

"The more people that are out the safer this city will be, and we are used to hosting big events. Fleet Week is just another one," he said. "There area always threats unfortunately, but fortunately, most are hoaxes."

The threat to New York comes as top Bush administration officials continued a chorus of warnings about potential attacks in the United States.

Secretary of State Colin Powell said terrorists are trying every way they can to get their hands on weapons of mass destruction — “whether radiological, chemical, biological or nuclear.” Briefing reporters, Powell said the anti-terrorism campaign must be waged on many fronts.

Homeland Security Chief Tom Ridge said Tuesday that, while U.S. officials have no specific credible evidence of a threat of suicide bombings in the United States, Americans would be "somewhat naive" if they felt immune.

Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld weighed in, telling a Senate subcommittee that terrorist groups will eventually get nuclear, chemical and biological weapons: ”They (terrorists) inevitably will get their hands on them and they will not hesitate to use them.''


Rumsfeld declined to discuss specific terrorist threats, saying the government sees hundreds a day. As many as 90 percent of them are designed simply to test the government's response.

Meanwhile, the Justice Department is taking issue with a report published Tuesday that Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were told about a memo from an FBI agent in Phoenix expressing concern about a large number of Arabs training at a U.S. flight school a few days after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Citing government officials, the New York Times reported that neither official briefed President Bush about the memo until recently. Ashcroft and Mueller have not said publicly when they learned of the July 10 memorandum, the Times said.

"But the officials (interviewed) said that within days of the attacks, senior law enforcement officials grasped the document's significance as a potentially important missed signal," the report added.

On Tuesday, the State Department sent its annual report on terrorism to Congress. The report listed the same seven countries — Iran, Sudan, Libya, Iraq, North Korea, Cuba and Syria — as state sponsors of terrorism last year.

Iran remains the world's most active sponsor of terrorism, while Sudan and Libya took some steps — but not enough — to “get out of the business,” the State Department said Tuesday.

Iran has intensified its backing for violent Palestinian groups that attacked Israel, but it also apparently has reduced its other terror activity, the State Department told Congress.

While Iranian President Mohammad Khatami condemned the Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S., supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei continued to refer to Israel as a “cancerous tumor” that must be removed.

In this mixed picture, the State Department said there was no evidence that Iran sponsored or knew in advance of the Sept. 11 attacks, a point U.S. law enforcement officials have made privately. And yet, matching Khamenei's rhetoric with action, Iran continued to supply Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestinian groups with funds, haven, training and weapons.

The report said Iraq provided training and political encouragement to many terror groups, but its main focus was on dissident Iraqis opposed to President Saddam Hussein.

Some of the seven listed countries, particularly Sudan and Libya, took steps to get out of the terrorism business, but “none has yet taken all necessary actions to divest itself of ties to terrorism,” the report said.

Overall, terrorist attacks claimed a record number of lives — 3,547 — in 2001, about 90 percent of them in the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania, the State Department said.

While the number of people who died in terror attacks went up, the number of international terror attacks declined to 346, down from 426 in 2000. A little more than half of the attacks, 178, were bombings against an international oil pipeline in Colombia.


The report called the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and an airline that crashed in Pennsylvania, “the worst international terrorist attack ever” — with the four coordinated suicide attacks by Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network killing more than 3,000 people from more than 78 countries.

It was the “bloodiest day on American soil since the Civil War,” said Francis X. Taylor, who directs the department's office to counter terrorism, and the most devastating international terrorist attack in world history.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2002 3:06:38 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: tyop
The only reason why I think this not just rhetoric from the government is because they overheard two detainees at guatanamo Bay talking about NYC Landmarks being targets for an attack.
3 posted on 05/21/2002 3:14:26 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
When Bush stops the lies that Isalm is peaceful the sooner we get what has to be done done!
4 posted on 05/21/2002 3:18:37 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Get Hillary down to defend the bridge.
TO THE BARRACADES !
5 posted on 05/21/2002 3:20:16 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
BUMP
6 posted on 05/21/2002 3:23:24 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Blaming Bush for this and that... BOY, now is really going to accomplish something. NOT!
7 posted on 05/21/2002 3:38:05 PM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Based on what happened on September 11, this may well be a misdirection ploy. The real targeting may involve the dismemberment of the National Command Authority in the DC region or major targets on the West Coast.

In any event, a terror strike deriving from 50 years of bankrupt US foreign policy is inevitable.

8 posted on 05/21/2002 3:38:18 PM PDT by Fulbright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
NO change in the threat level, though.
9 posted on 05/21/2002 3:39:15 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fulbright
Since they are good at hitting more than one target at the same time I would say its a good possiblity that East and West Coast may be hit at the same time.
10 posted on 05/21/2002 3:45:31 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan
No one is blaming Bush. but it is Bush that says this is a peaceful religion when it isn't even a religion. It is satan itself!
11 posted on 05/21/2002 3:48:25 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I hope they have dogs at the tunnel entrances. It might hold traffic up, but there probably won't be many going into the city by car,anyway.
12 posted on 05/21/2002 3:48:55 PM PDT by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
OK - we want to know WHICH OFFICIALS ARE THE TIMES CITING as saying these things? They always hide behind generalizing unless its republican comments that they criticize then they publish first and last names!
13 posted on 05/21/2002 3:50:33 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fulbright
In any event, a terror strike deriving from 50 years of bankrupt US foreign policy is inevitable...

In any event, a terror strike deriving from 1,400 years of bankrupt Islamic morality is inevitable...

14 posted on 05/21/2002 4:04:48 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
One more attack on American soil, and Arab/Muslim blood will run in the American streets. The people have had enough of being told about "diversity" and how peaceful islam is. Although I wouldn't condone it, one more attack will be enough to push many over the edge.

Deport them now, for our safety - and theirs.

15 posted on 05/21/2002 4:04:49 PM PDT by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fulbright
In any event, a terror strike deriving from 50 years of bankrupt US foreign policy is inevitable.

You sound like a typical talking-head liberal... and/or Pat Buchanan.

16 posted on 05/21/2002 4:11:32 PM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Maybe e's a Pat Buchanan/Helen Thomas Love Child????? ;0)
17 posted on 05/21/2002 4:12:40 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: all
There was just now a story on FOXNEWS about an sting gone wrong where terrorists were let into the country and lost by INS, or something to that effect. Can anyone find the story, I don't see it on FOX's site?
18 posted on 05/21/2002 4:14:56 PM PDT by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
On Tuesday, the State Department sent its annual report on terrorism to Congress. The report listed the same seven countries — Iran, Sudan, Libya, Iraq, North Korea, Cuba and Syria — as state sponsors of terrorism last year.

What about Pakistan? Its ISI intelligence service has been proven to assist terrorists attack India. Also as theonly Islamic nation with a nuke arsenal, and the fact it has a large base of Islamic zealots with a chip on their shoulder, don't you think it is a bigger threat than most of the nations listed above eg Sudan, Cuba, Syria, and even Libya?

?????

19 posted on 05/21/2002 4:16:20 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Actually some reports claim that if the kooks are to get weapons of mass destruction they shall either come from the Pakistanis covertly or from the Mafiya (Russian Mafia) with access to radiological material that happened to 'disappear.'
20 posted on 05/21/2002 4:21:48 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson