Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justanotherfreeper
Condit has to be the unluckiest human being on the planet.

Unlucky?!? He brought this whole mess completely onto himself! The scumbag intentionally lied and obstructed justice, whether or not he had anything to do with her death.

If this perp did randomly attack Chandra Levy, she could have been laying there injured for several days before dying. By obstructing the investigation Condit could have indirectly cost Chandra her life.(Admittedly pure speculation, but you see my point.)

That's what I'm so afraid of. If the police find that someone else did murder Chandra, everyone is going to throw up their hands and say, "Gee, Gary was completely innocent." No, Mr. Condit is not completely innocent. He just may not be guilty of murder.

19 posted on 05/23/2002 10:29:45 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Coop
Outstanding post!
30 posted on 05/23/2002 10:37:02 AM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Coop
I totally agree with you. Condit may not be guilty of murdering Chandra Levy, but he is not innocent. Remember, he lied three times to the investigative officials before admitting having an affair with Chandra. He also was caught disposing of evidence when he threw out that watch in a dumpster. That type of behavior is unfit for a Congressman.
42 posted on 05/23/2002 10:43:27 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Coop
Unlucky?!? He brought this whole mess completely onto himself! The scumbag intentionally lied and obstructed justice, whether or not he had anything to do with her death.

That's right. Even if DNA evidence proves this "park predator" killed Chandra, I won't feel one bit sorry for suspecting Gary Condit was involved.

The police are obligated to focus on people who LIE to them in missing persons/homicide investigations. By lying to the police, Condit forced them to make him an issue! So even if he didn't do anything intentionally to Chandra, his behavior hindered her investigation.

123 posted on 05/23/2002 11:45:32 AM PDT by Katie_Colic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Coop
No, Mr. Condit is not completely innocent. He just may not be guilty of murder.

Bingo. He is a user and abuser. If he really cared about Chandra who he was using for sex he would have swallowed his pride and been straightforward from the beginning.

393 posted on 05/23/2002 3:00:12 PM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson