Let's stay on #9 for awhile since the discussion there was just warming up.
July 7, 2001: Condit met with police for the third time. Condit admitted his intimate relationship with Levy.
July 9, 2001: Condit's new lawyer, Abbe Lowell, announced that Condit would agree to having the police search his apartment and would give them access to his telephone and cell phone records, as well as provide a DNA sample and consider taking a polygraph.
July 10, 2001: Chief Ramsey announced that the police would search Condit's apartment, obtain a DNA sample, and administer a polygraph exam to Condit.
Condit was seen suspiciously placing something in a trashcan in Alexandria, VA. A report was made to the police. The investigation found a watchbox for a Tag Hauer watch they traced back to Joleen Argentini-McKay. The watchcase was packed inside a Big Mac container. Condit's senior staffer Mike Dayton drove the car. Police later confirmed with Bureau of Prisons co-workers that Chandra wore a man's Tag Hauer watch.
Beginning about 11:15 p.m., investigators searched Condit's apartment.
July 11, 2001: At about 3 a.m., police completed the search of Condit's apartment
Let's rethink the watch; the police must have told Condit on the 7th during that interview that they wanted to search his apartment, one way or the other, with or without a subpoena; Lowell, being the swify that he is, decided to "get out in front of the parade" and make an announcement that HE could spin into "Condit is cooperating," and more than likely the police let him get away with it without too much fuss.
If he KNEW they were coming to investigate, why did he feel the need to get rid of that box? Why not dump it in the "burn bag" that every single congressman has.
He could not recall whether they had sex.
IMO, he should get the chair for that ONE statement alone. How dare he.
BTW, as I stated to you before, I am now interested in the early morning scream. AND the comforter by the door.