****CONDIT NAILED!**** Prosecutors Set to Indict on Obstructing Police Investigation

Nat'l Enquirer World Exclusive ^ | June 19, 2002 Issue | Mile Walker-Executive Editor

[Howlin]

An excellent observation!

[codebreaker]

[Types_with_Fist]

I think if they indict him for obstruction, they've given up on the murder charge.

Not Necessarily. Indicting him for any crime can open up the door to more investigation of him and staff. Don't take the Enquirer so lightly either. Didn't you see 'Real Men.'?

[aristeides]

Con dit, hmmm, you're right, never thought of that.

"Condidit" in Latin is the past tense of "condit." Condit is over.

[Rita289]

I'd like to see another source.

[codebreaker]

The next source will probably be the Washington Post or the NY Times.

[ClancyJ]

Let's just hope an indictment will get him off the intelligence committee.

[Rita289]

You know, you're probably right.

[DemoSmear]

Whenever the Enquirer or the Globe dwelve into political reporting, it is usually fairly accurate. You mentioned Ro[d]ger Clinton & JJ, but another example is the toe sucker Dick Morris. It was the Globe who outed him.

[cajungirl]

I think this will apply enormous pressure to condits staff to fess up what they know. And do not diss the Inquirer and the Globe,,they do get it right sometime.

[abner]

Didn't you see 'Real Men.'?

What a great movie. Youfos. I love that term.

[ClancyJ]

I know the Enquirer and others get it right some and glad they do. At least they stir the pot.

It is hard to protect this country when we have so many in our own government that are not worthy of the honor due to their lives or their backers. People like McKinney who is backed by terrorists and Condit who is involved in all forms of seediness are not people that are trustworthy. If they do the things they are doing - they would also sell the U.S. out for their personal gain. Get them out of the government.

[AmishDude]

"Real Men"??? Sorry, must have missed that one.

You have an excellent point about a new investigation starting up, but if he's indicted -- on anything -- he gets all kinds of rights that he didn't have before.

I still think if this is true, it indicates that they're giving up.

[Types_with_Fist]

I still think if this is true, it indicates that they're giving up.

Well, like you probably do, I hope you are mistaken.

[AmishDude]

Yes, I hope I'm mistaken also. I hope the article is true and the obstruction indictment is just the foot in the door to get that last bit of info to get him on murder.

[codebreaker]

Amen to that, if he is indicted is that enough to throw him off the intelligence committee?

[Kermit]

How many times did we hear during the Clinton years that Hillary was going to be indicted? That Bill Clinton was going to be named as an "unindicted co-conspirator"? That Dan Burton was going to blow up the Vince Foster investigation?

The rule in Washington DC is that "no one pays". So I won't believe that Condit will be indicted until he actually is indicted.

[submarine]

Indicting him for obstruction sounds like the perfect plan here. They can now proceed to question him in depth and possibly get their hands on various records he's refused to turn over.

And more importantly, I don't think prosecutors would be required to share their evidence on the murder itself with his team -- just the evidence supporting the obstruction charge.

[codebreaker]

And this wouldn't be the first time the Tabs get the goods from what is happening in the Grand Jury room.