Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

****CONDIT NAILED!**** Prosecutors Set to Indict on Obstructing Police Investigation
Nat'l Enquirer World Exclusive ^ | June 19, 2002 Issue | Mile Walker-Executive Editor

Posted on 06/07/2002 7:17:46 AM PDT by codebreaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Kermit
Did the Tabloids report that about the Clintons?
41 posted on 06/07/2002 8:19:56 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker; condidit; all
I already summarized this article yesterday in this post.
42 posted on 06/07/2002 8:23:10 AM PDT by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
Thanks, I didn't see that-we need all the possible clues we can find.
43 posted on 06/07/2002 8:24:37 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
I think they might have some difficulty convicting him of obstruction unless they have evidence that we are not aware of. Condit was under no legal obligation to talk to the police nor to allow a search of his appartment without a warrant. If they are pointing to his stupid attempt to toss a watchbox in a trash dumpster, they will have to prove that the watch is directly related to Chandra Levy's death, not just to a series of affairs. Intimidating the redhead also seems inconsequential. It would be a he said/she said plus to give it any meaning they would almost have to have evidence that Condit committed the murder. I dont think he out and out lied to the investigators in the meetings he had with them. He may not have been completely candid but then he didnt need to talk. Did I forget something? I dont see how the prosecutors could get him.
44 posted on 06/07/2002 8:40:31 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
You may have a point, I don't remember specifically. Do you know?
45 posted on 06/07/2002 8:41:48 AM PDT by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

46 posted on 06/07/2002 8:56:10 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
I think the watch box is the smoking gun. It was a Chandra gift and had identifying marks all over it.
47 posted on 06/07/2002 8:57:25 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I am so pessimistic about DC politicians taking care of one another that I am pleased if anything is charged against Condit.
48 posted on 06/07/2002 9:05:35 AM PDT by Chemnitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Amen to that, if he is indicted is that enough to throw him off the intelligence committee?

I don't know - just hoping we could win every now and then.

49 posted on 06/07/2002 9:30:33 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Knowing Congress, this might not be enough to throw him off the Intel Committee!
50 posted on 06/07/2002 9:31:49 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
The next source will probably be the Washington Post or the NY Times.

I hope you were suggesting that these two rags are on a par with Nat'l Enquirer.

51 posted on 06/07/2002 9:32:04 AM PDT by RWCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RWCon
No, usually how this goes is that the Tabloids break the story and soon after the Washington Compost gets a mysterious 'leak' since the story is altready out.
52 posted on 06/07/2002 9:34:55 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Well, now I need to know more about Arnie's marriage.
53 posted on 06/07/2002 9:46:01 AM PDT by Hank Rearden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
I just heard on the radio that a new bone of Chandra's (shin bone, I think they said) was just found some 30 yards from the original site of discovery.
54 posted on 06/07/2002 10:37:00 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist
Great screen name LOL
55 posted on 06/07/2002 10:44:16 AM PDT by thrcanbonly1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: all
The discovery was yesterday, by two Levy family investigators, former D.C. cops (isn't Ted Williams working for the Levys?) It was the shinbone, and it was found 25 yards from where Chandra's skull was found. Here's a link.
56 posted on 06/07/2002 10:51:05 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
That's an old cover from when Flaminni sold The Globe pictures form a biker rally Condit attended.
57 posted on 06/07/2002 10:54:06 AM PDT by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Plummz; all
I just put the report about Chandra's shinbone on its own thread: Un-&%$^#@* believable (CHANDRA SHINBONE FOUND BY LEVY INVESTIGATORS, 25 YARDS FROM SITE).

Chief Ramsey just said, "We blew it."

58 posted on 06/07/2002 11:08:09 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Now, now, let's not get too judgemental. Chief Ramsey and his band of incompetent merry men have tried real hard throughout this investigation to protect Gary Condit... I mean, to search for Chandra's remains and find her killer. Just because they overlooked part of her leg doesn't mean that they had the eyes closed the entire time they searched the park...
59 posted on 06/07/2002 11:31:50 AM PDT by Joan912
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
I think the watch box is the smoking gun. It was a Chandra gift and had identifying marks all over it.

I thought it had already been established that the watch was given to Condit by a former staffer he was having an affair with and not Chandra?

60 posted on 06/07/2002 11:56:09 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson