****CONDIT NAILED!**** Prosecutors Set to Indict on Obstructing Police Investigation

Nat'l Enquirer World Exclusive ^ | June 19, 2002 Issue | Mile Walker-Executive Editor

[Betty Jo]

Perhaps the "obstruction" is the phoney timeline.

Maybe the Grand Jury will question Vice Pres Cheney?

How many days in advance did Condit call for that meet?

Who was the Dr. that Condit met with?

Was that a lie?

Has he been questioned by the grand jury?

When was the appointment made?

Was Condit treated for "Accidental injuries?

Bruises from Chandra?

Cuts from her?

Condit has obstructed from the get-go.

Now in January he will be get-gone!

His sickening family will forever pay the price for enabling his activities.

Maybe they all will be indicted!

[crystalk]

I believe Ramsey has now admitted that he has never been at the body site.

[Palladin]

Give that man another donut!

[Marysecretary]

And it just makes you wonder how many more snakes in the Congress grass there are. LOTS, I would imagine. May God expose ALL of them for what they are.

[KneelBeforeZod]

This will be a day long remembered. It has seen the end of Skakel and it will soon see the end of Condit.

[aristeides]

I just heard something on WMAL Talk Radio about Condit being about to be indicted. Maybe they're just reporting the National Enquirer story. But still, it's something for this to be on the air.

[aristeides]

Yes, WMAL just had a more detailed report, and it's reporting the National Enquirer story. Something further: U.S. Attorney's Office (National Enquirer cited Justice Department sources) would neither confirm nor deny that Condit was about to be indicted.

[crystalk]

Gary Condit, you are the weakest link. Good-bye.

But what about his WIFE? How can they indict him, and not HER?

[Ann Archy]

Keep it clean, please.

[crystalk]

Gary Condit, you are the weakest link. Good-bye.

But what about his WIFE? How can they indict him, and not HER?

[Ann Archy]

And they are both GUILTY!! HAHAHAHAHAHHA

[goldstategop]

I don't know about the veracity of a tabloid like National Enquirer but let me say this: they got the scoop about Monica before the so called mainstream press did. Heck I wouldn't be surprised if they finally got the goods on Gary Condit-it. Believe me, I shed no tears for the guy. He remained silent about Chandra Levy when he could have been much more forthcoming. At the very least he deserves to have the book thrown at him for committing obstruction of justice, though I don't know about the murder angle. I'll be happy as a lark if they can get him for that one too. Call it the revenge of Chandra's ghost!

[terilyn]

You're right, the watch, (a Tag Heuer), was given to Condit by Jolene McKay, a former Condit staffer.

However, it seems it's entirely possible that Condit is a "re-gifter". Chandra wore a man's Tag Heuer watch according to her co-workers at the Bureau of Prisons.

If she had it on when she disappeared, it would make sense that Condit would want to discard the evidence of the box which would connect him to the watch which would presumably connect him to Chandra. The watch is numbered as is the box.

It is the dumping of the watch box that caught Condit in a proven lie. He dumped the box just prior to the DCPD coming in to search his apartment. He claimed to have dumped it to hide his previous affair with Ms. McKay. His reason for driving to Virginia to throw it away, INSIDE a McDonalds french fry box, inside a McDonalds bag was that the press was going through his trash.

When asked by the police why he threw something away that had been in his apartment prior to the police search he claimed that the box had been in his congressional office, not his apartment and that it was just trash.

If it had been in his office and it was "just trash" he could easily have thrown it away at his office because the congressional trash is not thrown away for the media to dig through. It's incinerated in-house.

[SupplySider]

I started reading the Enquirer during impeachemnet, after they broke many stories the so-called mainstream media would not touch. They were good during OJ, too.

My friends and relatives don't like to be seen with me buying it, though.

[M. Peach]

National Enquirer? When they were the first ones to get the blue dress story right after Clinton lied aabout it - Jay Leno asked, "When did you think the day would come when people would start believing the National Enquirer over the president?

[Cai Della]

To: National Enquirer

Why don't you see what you can find out about the watch? It's always been my belief that it will turn out to be the piece of evidence which cracks the case. Details about that one item have been closely guarded by the authorities.

[dalebert]

does this mean they will take him off the intel committee? I doubt it.

[Revolting cat!]

The posts that say nothing but "National Enquirer?" as if that all by itself was loaded with more meaning than the Iliad and the Odyssey, are so lame, lame and so 9-10. That is 9-10-1992. Can't you guys find something more original to say? Where have you been where the NE covered the OJ story, the Monica story and others, while Newspeak and the two Pravdas - the one on the Hudson and the one on the Potomac - were sitting the stories out, delaying, censoring. Let's move on beyond these predictable kneejerk reactions, shall we?!

[bmwcyle]

I told you a year ago it was him. Someday you will listen to your cat.

[dalebert]

"May God expose all". Amen