Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dpwiener
Nonetheless, a plausible argument can be made that the Congressional resolution you quoted is the functional equivalent of a "declaration of war" even if those exact words were not used.

Pure meecrob. Congress is required to declare war with a 2/3 vote and give a "declaration of war". When one has to spend hours stringing together opinions on this and that to explain why the resolution was the same as declaring war, when Congress should have just declared war, it is a prime example of mental yoga. Hell, they could dealre war right now, thus ending any and every legal dispute over the detention of persons helping the enemy.

There are several reasons why war wasnt declared. Among them are include the relationship of decalred war and the nullification of insurance policies. The second is that they typicallu need to name a country, and didn't want to name Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Thirdly, the gooberment needed an undending war to forward their orwellian plans.

16 posted on 06/14/2002 11:02:53 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: FreeTally
Pure meecrob. Congress is required to declare war with a 2/3 vote and give a "declaration of war".

They passed the Joint Resolution 99-1. The actual State of War was declared by our enemies on September 11th, 2001. You do remember the attacks, don't you? I'd say they were a pretty good indication that a State of War existed.

23 posted on 06/14/2002 11:07:27 AM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: FreeTally
Thirdly, the gooberment needed an undending war to forward their orwellian plans.

Glad you clarified that. LOL

24 posted on 06/14/2002 11:08:05 AM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson