Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News: Microsoft spreads virus--by accident
Special to ZDNet News ^ | June 14, 2002, 9:20 AM PT | By Robert Lemos

Posted on 06/14/2002 5:22:49 PM PDT by amigatec

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: magellan
I would suggest that Windows itself is a computer virus plague.
41 posted on 06/14/2002 7:50:39 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Have you ever tried Adobe Acrobat?

Yes. At work we use Adobe Acrobat for many uploads.

Even so, most of the back-and-forth is in Microsoft (tm) Word (TM) format.

The emails fly hither and thither, but the ruling factor is that eveyone is using Microsoft (tm) Word, or Microsoft (tm) PowerPoint, or Microsoft (tm) Excel.

The basic problem is that we have no alternative for file compatibility.

I would not mind the cruddy Microsoft (tm) software so much if there was an alternative.

That alternative would be software that did what one told it to do, nothing more, and 100% file compatibility with Microsoft (tm).

Microsoft (tm) is very much like the 100,000 pound gorilla, you can't ignore it.

I am not one of those liberal loosers who object to Bill getting rich. I only hope that someday I will come up with an even better idea that will make me even richer than he.

I do object to bug filled software that does everything except what I want it to do.

42 posted on 06/14/2002 8:16:19 PM PDT by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000, all
Standard MS defense tactic #42: Peasants with Pitchforks'

When faced with an embarrasing situation for The Company, the sales agent should rely upon the 'peasants with pitchforks' technique. Get out the 'torches' and burn the thread to the ground. Insult, attack people and generally make the thread too hot for the MS "bashers".

Goal: MS critics generally dislike 'flame wars' and will abandon the thread, thereby stopping the criticism of MS in the public forum.

43 posted on 06/14/2002 8:19:30 PM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Here you go...

Knock yourself out.  One less complainer is worth the loss in revenue to Microsoft.

Software602 PC Suite

44 posted on 06/14/2002 8:32:09 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
Kill 'em all! Let Bill sort them out!
45 posted on 06/14/2002 8:36:17 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
Man, that has just GOT to be embarassing! Who reviewed the RTM???
46 posted on 06/14/2002 8:46:55 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
How can you be so unconcerned by such a lack of quality control. It's not a bug, it's a friggin virus, man!
47 posted on 06/14/2002 8:49:27 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
How can you be so unconcerned by such a lack of quality control. It's not a bug, it's a friggin virus, man!

You're not listening. I *am* concerned by the lack of quality control. I'm not excusing the fundamental issues; however, I am suggesting that some of this feigned outrage is a little bit over the top considering that this problem never affected a single user.
48 posted on 06/15/2002 12:55:33 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
The trouble is that it revealed a stupified security methodology. It was plain dumb luck that it happened in an environment which was not friendly to the worm. In some other environment -- such as a distribution of a service pack of Windows -- where a user poking around could invoke the worm, it would be a disaster.
49 posted on 06/15/2002 1:24:22 AM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
P.S. If they had McAfee'd the whole distribution disk, they would have caught it.
50 posted on 06/15/2002 1:25:11 AM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: drlevy88
Agree on both points.
51 posted on 06/15/2002 1:28:47 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Thanks! I will check it out.
52 posted on 06/15/2002 4:30:42 AM PDT by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson