Oh please. You do talk such a lot of gibberish. It is perfectly clear from Condit's lifestyle -- the secrecy, the separate cabs, the getting off at the wrong floor, the fake names, the strict rules, the bodyguards, the neckties under the bed, the gang bangs, the body shaving, etc. -- that Condit had ample motive to kill a wayward "bitch." Just look at the guy's face -- he's a white trash psycho, just like his brother, only with a manicure and a $100 haircut. His actions since Chandra's disappearance make it perfectly clear that he is the killer. It's perfectly bloody obvious to anyone with a lick of sense.
I havn't been in D.C. for years but you are painting a perfect picture of JFK and RFK when they first hit the senate. But Gary is not in their class. I don't think Garry ever got movie stars to do him.
A few years back I came out of a campaign event to find a currently serving Congressman getting a blow job in my Radio Station Van. It was no big deal. He wasn't even embarrased. They young girl wasn't either. She was a news reporter supposedly covering him. I had to admit that she covered him well. But her coverage sucked.
You are incredibly naive. I was in the media for 5 years before I found out some men actually had to ask for sex. I thought all men had at least 5 females a day offer them sex. I knew they asked those of us in the media. All the politicans I covered got similar offers too.
My first day on the job as a supervisor a young female came into my office lifted her skirt and said,"See anything you like?" I told my boss that something strange had just happened. I described what she had done and paused. My boss said, "I don't have all day to listen to you prattle. What was it happened that was strange?"
Have you have always been clueless or did you take lessons?