Replies

Remember that Police have said that Ricci is working with them, but that his alibi cannot be fully verified and the "media" is saying that he failed at least one polygraph. Whatever parole violation they brought him in on, must be something that allows them to search his cars and home and also allows them to hold him.

He could have failed a drug test or they found something on him that is against his parole terms.

I just don't know what to think about these little girls getting snatched up in the west. Wouldn't it be horrible if it were just ONE predator, and other individuals are taking the heat for his crimes?

I'm sorry, but sometimes I don't trust our law enforcement officers or prosecutors. They WILL fabricate to make their records look good. Or ... sometimes they are just plain ole incompetent. I sure hope the ones in SLC don't rise to any of these occasions!

Ricci got out of prison on his last sentence in September 2001, he served 56 months for theft of a food pantry.

His MO is burglary and theft. No records of sex crimes in his history.

He is in custody right now over the theft of the Smart home and is also a suspect in another unrelated burglary. His alibi for the early morning hours of June 5th, 2002 is that he was at home in bed with his wife. During the evening of June 4th, 2002 his alibi is he was with friends. He was off work on June 5th, 2002. (In my opinion this is exactly why he is considered a suspect... I would assume that he has no witnesses to where he was during the day of June 5th, his step-child was probably at school or at friends and his wife was probably at work, this would explain why they are questioning his neighbors, to see if anyone saw him at home on June 5th, his day off work.)

The more facts I hear, the more I DO NOT believe it is Ricci.