To: Impeach98
I agree, but I believe the offending judge in this case was a Nixon appointee.
2 posted on
06/26/2002 1:03:16 PM PDT by
Callahan
To: Callahan
I thought it was a 3 judge panel.
To: Callahan
NO BIG DEAL.
Just go back to the way the pledge was before 1954 when Eisenhower added the "under god" phrase in 1954.
What's the controversy??
To: Callahan
9th District Makeup of judges and president who appointed:
CLICK HERE
5 posted on
06/26/2002 1:08:37 PM PDT by
Impeach98
To: Callahan
Here's the ruling:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0 ,2933,56310,00.html
According to it, these were the judges:
Presiding: Edward J. Schwartz (?)
Argued before: Alfred T. Goodwin (Nixon), Steven Reinhardt (Carter), and Ferdinand F. Fernandez (Bush I)
With opinions by: Goodwin, partial dissent by Fernandez
To: Callahan
I believe the offending judge in this case was a Nixon appointee. Who ever accused Nixon of being a conservative? In addition to imposing wage and price controls, just review the legislation he signed and his executive orders. He caused half the mess we're in today. We can thank him for the EPA, the Endangered Species Act, a host of other restrictive environmental bills including bans on offshore oil drilling, and a witch's-brew of affirmative action silliness. Domestically, he was one of the worst presidents in my lifetime.
To: Callahan
That may be the case, however factor in age, senility, just plain stupidity and living on the left coast.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson