Replies

Boy Im impressed. This was posted several days after Bush said that Arafat has to go if the Palestinians are ever to have a state of their own. In addition to the eliminination of Arafat, the Pali's have to create a real legislature and court system, hold elections, write a constitution, STOP terrorism. They can move towards this state three years after this is done. Before the process can even begin, Arafat has to go. What do you think the chances of that happening any time soon?

Klayman should jump back in his sewer. He brings the same stupidity to this foreign policy analysis that he does to his judical feats.

"Klayman should jump back in his sewer. He brings the same stupidity to this foreign policy analysis that he does to his judical feats."

Larry Klayman and all the employees at Judicial Watch are intelligent and principled people, I am sure.

I personally have no problem with his foreign policy standpoint on the Middle East dilemma as of now. He has never claimed to be a foreign policy expert, he was INVITED onto to that show as guest to comment on FOREIGN POLICY. In otherwords, he did not invite himself. I personally do not support any kind of Palestinian state, especially as of now. I believe that there must be certain pre-existing conditions in order for democracy to be a viable option in any nation, and the Palestinians do not have any of these prerequisites as of now. The reason President Bush had to blatantly state "no Arafat" to the Palestinians is probably because they would have re-elected him anyway, had they the chance and choice.

By the way, are you still downplaying the role that traditional organized crime plays with unions?