Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News Comes Down on the Side of God
Studio Briefing ^ | June 28, 2002 | Lew Irwin

Posted on 06/28/2002 11:20:05 AM PDT by X-USAF

Fox News's decision to display the office telephone number of the San Francisco federal judge who struck down the use of "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance on Wednesday has raised eyebrows among some broadcast journalists. Bob Roberts, a reporter for WBBM Radio news in Chicago, commented in the industry newsletter Shop Talk: "Where I come from, that's harassment. There are plenty of ways to air the story without stooping to that level." Other news organizations focused on how the ruling by Judge Alfred Goodwin of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco had touched off outrage among the general public. Few noted that similar court decrees in the past had referred to the court's duty to protect the "establishment clause" of the Constitution from the "tyranny of the majority." (On Thursday, Judge Goodwin stayed his own order.)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fox; foxnews; goodwin; judge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Fox took a chapter out of the Free Republic's playbook. Way to go Fox!

I wonder how many actually called because of Fox's decision.

1 posted on 06/28/2002 11:20:06 AM PDT by X-USAF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
I was thinking you were going to mention Brit Hume's closing comments the past two nights - "fair, balanced, unafraid, and under God".

Brit is awesome.

2 posted on 06/28/2002 11:26:55 AM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
Looks like they were reporting the information & letting the viewers decide if they wanted to call.
3 posted on 06/28/2002 11:29:23 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
"Bob Roberts, a reporter for WBBM Radio news in Chicago, commented in the industry newsletter Shop Talk: "Where I come from, that's harassment." "

Public office holders have no rights to privacy on public ground. Don't you just love it when others use the DimWits own tactics against them :)

4 posted on 06/28/2002 11:29:32 AM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
They should also publish his home address and phone number as well.
5 posted on 06/28/2002 11:30:37 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF; LarryLied
A lot of posters said, round about December of last year, that Fox was moving left and wasn't to be trusted.
6 posted on 06/28/2002 11:31:01 AM PDT by mv1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
Judge Alfred Goodwin of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has suspended his decision pending appeal. Looks like a dead issue.
7 posted on 06/28/2002 11:31:33 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
"On Thursday, Judge Goodwin stayed his own order."

Must've been a reaction to all the death threats from so many "Christians".

8 posted on 06/28/2002 11:32:23 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
I agree. We report, you decide. They reported the number, Americans decided to call.


9 posted on 06/28/2002 11:35:21 AM PDT by X-USAF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
Brit is a babe. =)
10 posted on 06/28/2002 11:36:19 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
Bob Roberts would have a hard time defining harassment.

I bet he has trouble defining the word "is".

11 posted on 06/28/2002 11:37:48 AM PDT by X-USAF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Must've been a reaction to all the death threats from so many "Christians".

No, it's death threats from DU pukes posing as Christians.

12 posted on 06/28/2002 11:38:10 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
I heard that too, I am EXTREMELY proud of FOX!! Brit kicks!
13 posted on 06/28/2002 11:39:08 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
This will be an unpopular comment under the circumstances, but I have real problems with public pressure being used on federal judges. I guess you have the right to call, but the federal judge should totally ignore the calls. It is not a popularity contest, and it isn't a congressman's office where they see how the calls are running. The judiciary should be totally independent, and it frankly shouldn't care who is angered by the decisions. Picture an umpire.

I totally oppose the decision, but one of my favorite sayings is taht if you ask a judge or jury a question, you run the risk of getting an answer. I blame the people who appointed these judges,the earlier establishment clause decisions that provided cover for this one, and the judges themselves.

14 posted on 06/28/2002 11:40:19 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
"Where I come from, that's harassment. There are plenty of ways to air the story without stooping to that level."

I don't find that stooping at all - if anything, it's having the courage of your convictions. Something that the other nets seem to be lacking in for the most part...

15 posted on 06/28/2002 11:42:51 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aggie Mama
Brit is a babe.

Though I cannot agree with you, I can tell you that my significant other refers to Brit Hume as Basset Hound.


16 posted on 06/28/2002 11:44:08 AM PDT by X-USAF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: X-USAF
Raising eyebrows of broadcast journalists. What a joke. They sure don't mind activism as long as it's aimed in the other direction.

MM

17 posted on 06/28/2002 11:44:33 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
More likely due to Dr. Newdow's own too-clever-by-half-comments, in which he admitted that the case was basically a sham, i.e. his daughter didn't mind saying the pledge, rather it was he who had the problem.

The correct decision based on this "new evidence" would be for the court to vacate the ruling and impose Rule 11 sanctions on Dr. Newdow in the form of paying the school board's attorney fees

18 posted on 06/28/2002 11:45:07 AM PDT by Boatlawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: X-USAF
What about his silly ruling......that's harrassing the whole damn country.

Quote of the day....

"...It has been well said that really up-to-date liberals do not care what people do, as long as it is compulsory"...George Will

20 posted on 06/28/2002 11:50:52 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson