[ThePythonicCow]

Last week, the California courts tried to establish a new religion: secularism.

Nothing new about that religion, nor about our damn courts trying to establish it. They've been chasing God out of our public life for decades now.

[Southack]

From a legal viewpoint, what the 9th Circuit did wrong was overlook the 1943 Supreme Court decision which ruled that the pledge was voluntary.

You can't ban voluntary speech, especially if your aim is to "sanitize" all speech on government property of any reference to theism (because that would create a bias towards atheism).

If the court had said that people can't be compelled to pledge, then that would have been one thing (although possibly outside the scope of that case even then).

But they went further than that. They said that people can't make the pledge at all in front of students.

They can't do that, Constitutionally, and that's why their decision will be voided, either by themselves or by the Supreme Court.

Voluntary speech can't be banned, after all.

[ladyinred]

Please tell everyone that this is not a California court actually. This is a federal court, serving many states in the West. We have enough trouble with our real California courts to take the blame for the federal system.