Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim Crow-like laws coming to Pa.
The York Dispatch ^ | July 2, 2002 | Rep. Phyllis Mundy D-Luzerne

Posted on 07/02/2002 12:42:57 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater

In the most blatant attempt to disenfranchise voters since the "Jim Crow" laws of the old South, the Republican Majority in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives rammed through a late-night measure sponsored by state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Butler, by a vote of 100-99 that could prevent thousands of registered Pennsylvanians from voting in the fall election.

If this measure is enacted, Pennsylvania would join South Carolina as having the most restrictive voter identification requirement of any state in the nation.

The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or "valid" photo identification prior to voting at the polls. Examples of valid photo identification cards include driver's licenses, student identification cards, employee identification cards, U.S. passports and armed forces identification.

This vote, above all, points to the Republican Party's desperate attempt to hold onto power in the face of losing control of the governor's mansion and the state House this coming November. Statewide polls show that Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ed Rendell has a commanding double-digit lead. Even the White House has recognized that there is a good chance that Democrats will take control this November.

More important than the politics of this issue is the flagrant disregard the Republican majority showed for one of our most fundamental rights as citizens of the United States and Pennsylvania -- the right to vote. Until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1964, many Southern states had "Jim Crow" laws on the books which required literacy tests and other methods to suppress the rights of blacks and poor whites to vote.

By requiring a photo identification card such as a driver's license or employee card, many Pennsylvanians such as lower-income people and senior citizens who don't drive would be denied the right to vote. Moreover, many people who simply forget their registration cards or photo identifications will be deprived the opportunity to vote.

Most voters don't even carry their voter registration cards with them or have thrown them away. In fact, the back of your voter registration cards clearly state that they relate only to date of issue not proof of right to vote. In other words, they specifically say you don't need them to vote.

The 2000 presidential elections provided an unfortunate situation where outdated and unreliable voter equipment disenfranchised thousands of voters and altered the course of the election. This should have been a lesson to all of us. Yet, the House Republicans compounded these mechanical obstacles to voting by erecting an institutional roadblock. In an era when less than half of eligible voters go to the polls, this is an arrogant slap in the face to democracy and the citizens of Pennsylvania.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Pa. Democrats are really opposing this step to ensure election integrity.

The story that inspired this editorial... Republicans back bill to show ID before voting: Democrats say change would cost Rendell votes
1 posted on 07/02/2002 12:42:57 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater; Neckbone
Oh, how shocking! Valid identification? What a blatant attempt to violate their rights!
2 posted on 07/02/2002 12:43:54 PM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
Even so, without brave (or reinforced with tough guys) poll watchers in Philly even voter ID is meaningless.
3 posted on 07/02/2002 12:45:54 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or "valid" photo identification prior to voting at the polls.

Shouldn't this be required in all 50 states?

4 posted on 07/02/2002 12:46:40 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
We have this law in Tennessee. Everyone can get a voter registration card, or get it replaced if it's lost. How else do you prove that you are who you say you are and have the right to vote in the precinct in which you are voting?
5 posted on 07/02/2002 12:47:56 PM PDT by OrangeDaisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
Where is the double-HURL-YACK-Alert?!

I mean those mean Republicans, they want people to have valid identification? How could they?!

6 posted on 07/02/2002 12:48:30 PM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
OK with me! We have enough Dem vote fraud here!
7 posted on 07/02/2002 12:48:59 PM PDT by gilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
This is a good idea. Can we impliment this right away?
8 posted on 07/02/2002 12:49:25 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
The PA Senate may consider it in September. The statute will need to be signed by the Governor 30 days before the election. I'm not sure what a legal challenge would do. It is a step in the right direction for sure!
9 posted on 07/02/2002 12:52:22 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater; Temple Owl
Statewide polls show that Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ed Rendell has a commanding double-digit lead.

As each day passes, and the election draws closer, I continue to question the wisdom behind Fisher’s Super-Secret-Double-Stealth Campaign.

I’d like to know what kind of lead Rendell would have if the pollsters simply asked “What candidate do you plan on voting for in the fall elections” and only counted those who gave an actual candidate’s name. I’d have to assume that it would be close to 30% when all the “Not Rendell” or “Whoever the Republican guy is” responses were filtered out.

Come on Fisher! Emerge from the bunker! If you continue to rely on a campaign based on self concealment, things look dark in November for Pennsylvania Republicans.

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

10 posted on 07/02/2002 12:52:34 PM PDT by End Times Sentinel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
Sorry about that!!! I'm just used to it, I suppose.
11 posted on 07/02/2002 12:53:32 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
Moreover, many people who simply forget their registration cards or photo identifications will be deprived the opportunity to vote.

Yeah, and many people who simply lose their car keys will be denied the opportunity to drive. Sounds like a logistics issue that can be handled on the individual level.

Oh, that's right--one of the requisites for being a liberal in the first place is to have no confidence in the ability of individuals to run their own lives.

12 posted on 07/02/2002 12:53:45 PM PDT by nravoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
I think that during the 2000 election the total number of votes cast in Philadelphia was over 90% of the number registered to vote. Totally unbelievable.
13 posted on 07/02/2002 12:54:09 PM PDT by StopGlobalWhining
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
By requiring a photo identification card such as a driver's license or employee card, many Pennsylvanians such as lower-income people and senior citizens who don't drive would be denied the right to vote.

Republicans should call their bluff, by adding a provision to buy photo IDs for citizens who can't afford one.

Moreover, many people who simply forget their registration cards or photo identifications will be deprived the opportunity to vote.

Sheesh! Make a point of not forgetting it, stupid.

What a pack of liars.

14 posted on 07/02/2002 12:54:27 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
In fact, the back of your voter registration cards clearly state that they relate only to date of issue not proof of right to vote. In other words, they specifically say you don't need them to vote.

Incredible reasoning...boggles the mind!

15 posted on 07/02/2002 12:57:31 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
We have it in Conn., but didn't have it in Chicagol, nor in Manhattan; when I was volting in those places.

16 posted on 07/02/2002 12:57:33 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Lee_Atwater
You know, this would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. Imagine! Having to show your identification. What a shock. My family lives in South Carolina. My grand mother no longer drives. BUT, she has a state identification card. It looks just like a driver's license, and she gets it from the DMV. Would that be so difficult for others to get?
18 posted on 07/02/2002 12:59:52 PM PDT by Isadora Duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
I>The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or "valid" photo identification prior to voting at the polls...

Hummpphh! Well all I can say is that things have come to a pretty pass when you have to show a photo ID of yourself when you want to vote! I mean, it was shocking enough when the "Jim Crow" laws made the people who wanted to vote actually prove they could read and write. And now this! (sarcasm)

19 posted on 07/02/2002 1:02:06 PM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lee_Atwater
The amendment requires voters to present either their voter registration cards or "valid" photo identification prior to voting at the polls. Examples of valid photo identification cards include driver's licenses, student identification cards, employee identification cards, U.S. passports and armed forces identification.

Let me see if I understand this. Requiring proof of voter eligiblity is now the same thing as Jim Crow laws. What planet are these people from? The scary part is that people may actually believe this tripe.

20 posted on 07/02/2002 1:02:21 PM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson