My (admittedly silly) analogy of the golf ball in # 38 was to say this... Suppose God really DID create the Earth in a matter of days. Any way, or "style" that God chose to make the earth would, by necessity, leave some "Geology".
If God made rocks and trees and a core and a mantle, etc, they took the forms he chose them to take. If man comes along and makes inferences into those forms, with a bias towards "evolution", than one can postulate just about anything and any age.
If one accepts the basic supposition that God made the Universe, and Earth as a HABITAT for people, (and not people coincidently being a bi-product of earth) then he would make that habitat livable and pleasant and orderly. It would have a ready-made "geology". No?
I've another proposition.
The universe is six days old. A cat named Queen Maeve created it in its entirety last Thursday. The appearance of age and all of our memories prior to last Thursday were part of the creation.
Such a proposition is just as meaningful to science as yours. It's also just as falsifiable (which is to say that it is not) and it has just as much evidence (which is to say that it has none).