Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lower55
She must not have been in her bed that night

Or any night recently...or the bedding had been washed..or Danielle just didn't have or get the dog hairs in her bedding.

BVD said the dog had peed in Danielles room within days of her disappearance so the dog had supposedly been in the room..that's why the steam cleaner was supposedly in the MB.

Another oddity without answers.

77 posted on 07/09/2002 10:48:04 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Rheo
Why would they check for dog hairs on her bedding? There is no evidentiary purpose to it. The dog and she lived in the same house. They looked for evidence coming from humans. They must collect a ton of fibers and will testify to the pertinent.
116 posted on 07/09/2002 11:10:56 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson