To: bvw
"Because of him, it's just ruined everyone's lives.""
A little girl was killed and she is whining. If she had rephrased this whole interview into something positive, she probably would have been offered other jobs, instead it was all about her.
If she had said she knew she had to do the right thing by testifying honestly at the trial to put away the child's killer, even if it meant losing her job, she would have gained more sympathy and probably a few job offers along the way.
To: FR_addict
I am surprised she testified about the drug use -- she should have refused to testify on the grounds it would incriminate her. So why did she? Strange.
But in the spirit of this crazy prosecution and the freeping treatment of it, of course I have two theories:
- She was paid to testify rather than take the fifth.
- Drug use is so normal and everday to her, that she was blissfully ignorant of the ramifications of her testimony.
27 posted on
07/12/2002 7:50:21 AM PDT by
bvw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson