Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I enjoyed this essay.
1 posted on 07/15/2002 7:41:40 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: american colleen
I enjoyed this essay.

I did too. I especially appreciated the highlighting of Jesus words:

He who is not against us is with us.

The Good Lord casts a wide net, doesnt' He?

2 posted on 07/15/2002 7:49:25 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
Good stuff. I am a no-longer-bitter, ex-Catholic, who is re-awakening to the fact that the 'ol gal ain't so bad after all.
3 posted on 07/15/2002 8:08:26 PM PDT by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
"The first is a saying by Jesus of Nazareth which reflects rather remarkably the "pre-Vatican II" teaching that outside the Church there is no salvation."

When Jesus spoke these words the "Catholic" church did not exist. I'm a bit rusty with my exact Biblical quotes, but I believe Jesus said something to the effect that "wherever two are gathered in my name, I am there."

Now as I said, I'm a bit rusty, but I don't believe he said "wherever two Catholics are gathered in my name, I am there." And to tell you the truth, I feel closer to God when I am wandering around alone in the Cedar swamps up here where I live......

4 posted on 07/15/2002 8:12:32 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Catholic_list; Diago; Salvation; patent
.
5 posted on 07/15/2002 8:37:02 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: father_elijah; Antoninus; aposiopetic; Salvation; ELS; nina0113; Steve0113; el_chupacabra; ...
Leaving our friends to work out their differences in this productive manner,
LOL. Bumping, click my screen name for a description, etc.

patent  +AMDG

7 posted on 07/15/2002 9:13:49 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
Here's an on-line book, Is Feenyism Catholic? by Fr. Francois Laisney.
14 posted on 07/16/2002 12:44:39 AM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
This article was pretty good. I have spent hours and hours dealing with this issue with my former friends on the schismatic right. I am on vacation right now and don't have access to my books, but I do recall citing the old Roman Missal to help buttress the constant teaching that constitutes EENS.
Jan 23rd is the Feast of St. Emerentiana who was martyred while a Catechumen. End of arguement as far as I am concerned. She is a Saint who was never "inside."
Of course, Trent also supports the teaching. About Baptism, it teaches that an adults need not be Baptised immediately while Catechumens because if they were to die the desire of Baptism would suffice to righteousness. They too would be among those saved while "outside."
16 posted on 07/16/2002 3:08:26 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
From Cardinal Kasper:

Liturgical good news -- from the Vatican!

Despite all the bad news from the Vatican's liturgy office, there's good news down the hall. Cardinal Walter Kasper's Christian Unity office, in consultation with Ratzinger's doctrinal commission and another on Eastern Churches, recently published guidelines that allow the Chaldean Church, a church in union with Rome, to pray the Eucharistic Prayer of the Assyrian Church (not in union with Rome). This prayer does not contain the traditional narrative of the institution of the eucharist. Thus Rome has recognized that the Eucharistic Prayer can be enacted, bread and wine becoming for us the body and blood of Christ as we give God thanks, without the "words of consecration." The whole prayer is consecratory. Liturgy scholar Gabe Huck told ChurchWatch, "This is important because it tells us we must see this prayer as a whole, done by presider proclaiming and assembly acclaiming, from 'Lift up your hearts!' to the great Amen."

From http://www.cta-usa.org/watch02-02/newsbriefs.html

Kasper's article, beneath its complicated details, is animated by the desire to secure greater "pastoral flexibility" in areas where a gap seems to be widening between the Church's official positions and the actual practices of many local churches. It is a fact that the Church's official positions tend to be implemented with increasing reluctance, if not simply ignored, in many local churches throughout the world, particularly in countries such as the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan, and the nations of western Europe. Areas of disagreement and contention with the Vatican include, according to Kasper, "ethical issues, sacramental discipline and ecumenical practices." This likely translates into the Church's widely controverted and ignored prohibitions against homosexual acts, premarital cohabitation, and "remarriage" outside the Church — and her ban prohibiting those involved in these things, or those whose affiliation is non-Catholic, from receiving Holy Communion. There is also the matter of contraception. It is widely known that there are bishops and priests who favor an open communion policy, and that few would turn away anyone approaching the altar, whatever his sexual practice, marital status, or church affiliation. Cardinal Martini of Milan has been reported as saying, for instance, that the Church has no business getting involved in the personal morals of individual Catholics. As we shall see, Kasper seems inclined to agree with this perspective.

From http://www.newoxfordreview.org/apr02/philipblosser.html

18 posted on 07/16/2002 5:04:54 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
The Immaculate Conception is definitely still "IN." Especially among the "Mary Men" of which I know scores. And for the most part, they're lay people.
24 posted on 07/16/2002 6:19:27 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
"How about those doily thingamabobs on women's heads?" he'd ask. "Oh, that went out with Vatican II."

Lots of Catholic women now go to curch wearing blue jeans.

36 posted on 07/16/2002 7:24:17 AM PDT by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
No Catholic should ever have to wonder what the Church teaches today. The 'internals' are the same as they always were, with changes in the 'externals'. The relevant priest who can talk to the young at the 'Church of What's Happening Now' and the local Nazi Nun may have their own opinions, but the Church didn't change Her core teachings with Vatican II.

If you want to know what is expected of a good Catholic, what to teach your children, and you don't have a lot of time to spend looking around for books and materials, just buy a copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. When you have a question, look up the subject in the index! My brother in law used the Catechism in the Confirmation classes in his Parish, and when the kids were confirmed, the Parish gave them each a copy for themselves.

As with people and politics, most Catholics don't take the time to inform themselves of the Church's teachings, and if the preaching in their Parish is as woefully inadequate as it was in ours for many years, they certainly won't get the message when they go to Mass on Sunday. We have a new Assoc. Pastor who is a very good homilist, and he's even begun to be an influence on the preaching of our Pastor. Nothing helps like raising the standard.

38 posted on 07/16/2002 7:43:37 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
Hi--I also like this post. I skimmed through the commentary and noticed no one mentioned that the Baltimore Catechism (very pre-Vatican 2) said pretty much the same thing as the Council: that he who through no fault of his own doesn't recognize the Catholic Church as being the One True Chruch can still be saved.

And as you correctly saw, it's not so different from Protestants who believe only Christians (but not necessarily Catholics :-)) can be saved.

To me it's important but not to get hung up about. After all, we are not God and can never know the mind of God in each specific case.

However, it does make me wonder of our responsibilities to evangelize. It's scary to think how we will be judged. We always need to stand up for Jesus and His Church at the very least.

From what I know about Cdnl. Kaspar and Martini, it was probably they Our Lady of LaSalette was referreing to when she said Rome would lose the faith. However, I did se

41 posted on 07/16/2002 8:45:59 AM PDT by attagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
I like Mark Shea's style. He presents two sayings of Christ that should be important to all Catholics today.

He who is not with me is against me.

For he that is not against us is for us.

At once this may seem to present a paradox. But for sure, it does not. Jesus knew well the extremisms that existed in his days. The Pharisees and Saducees who were extremist rigorists and the lapsed Jews who were comparable to our modernists. Jesus was basically telling his disciples that extremism was not of the Gospel.

I'm not sure what saint said it (Aquinas maybe), that extremism was a vice that corrupted the virtues of prudence, patience, humility and love!

43 posted on 07/16/2002 9:40:28 AM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
"He that is not against us is for us." This saying is the paradoxical complement to his first saying. For it makes the common sense point that, on the one hand, there is no salvation outside the Church, yet, on the other hand, we puny mortals do not know where "outside" is.... God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.

I enjoyed this essay too, american colleen. Thanks so much for posting it.

44 posted on 07/16/2002 10:41:57 AM PDT by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
BUMP for later reading.
54 posted on 07/16/2002 3:03:18 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
As a convert, I joined the Catholic Church for what the Holy Spirit led me to believe were true teachings. I get upset with Catholics who really do think that Vatican II changed the basic religion and doctrines of the Church.
61 posted on 07/16/2002 10:16:07 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: american colleen
However, Vatican II taught that Protestants and other non-Catholics, heck, even non-Christians, could be saved. That is a total reversal and it is wonderful/terrible!" (Here the Progressive and Traditionalist dissenters fall on each other shouting, "It's terrible! It's wonderful!" and roll away in the dust, pulling each other's hair, kicking and scratching.)


Wonderful! LOL!

67 posted on 07/19/2002 8:31:05 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson