Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This may be a response to the sports editorial that appeared in the Oklahoman a couple of days ago. It was very similar to a number of articles that appeared across the country deriding Tiger on his choice not to become embroiled in the debate over Augusta.

Here is the article from Wednesday. By the way, when did the DNC start faxing talking points to sports journalists?

1 posted on 07/19/2002 9:37:47 AM PDT by rwfok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rwfok
Sorry, here is the article from yesterday.

Tiger whiffs on his big shot to take a stand

2 posted on 07/19/2002 9:41:32 AM PDT by rwfok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfok
"By the way, it's absurd to compare the men-only club rule with policies that once excluded blacks or Jews. Should women and men compete in the same golf tournaments? Is it "sexist" to insist that women can't compete against men in tournaments with the biggest payoffs? "

The issue isn't whether women should compete in the Masters. It's whether or not Tiger Woods should compete in a tournament that's held by a club that doesn't allow female members (both the Masters and the British Open qualify in this regard).

3 posted on 07/19/2002 9:43:29 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfok

Woods, though, isn't comfortable in the role of world- changer. He wants to play golf. He devotes his time between tournaments to promote causes that aren't political. Yet those who want to abolish men-only golf courses think Woods should tee up their cause and hit that ball as far as his fame can take it.

It's as if she (Martha Burk, chairwoman National Council of Women's Organizations that started the flap) and the media expect they have a right of passage over Tiger Woods wherein he must accommodate them.

Tiger handled the media questions superbly.

4 posted on 07/19/2002 9:55:02 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfok
As I have said before, Tiger is an athlete who lets his club do his talking.
5 posted on 07/19/2002 9:56:46 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; South40; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

15 posted on 07/19/2002 10:44:54 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfok
AMEN! Excellent response.
17 posted on 07/19/2002 12:33:11 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfok
Augusta is Augusta... they didn't offer Arnold Palmer a membership until over 20 years after his first Masters win.

They protect their membership rolls very tightly. Kudos for Tiger for not becoming too embroiled in other people's battles.

18 posted on 07/19/2002 12:34:32 PM PDT by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfok
I was happy to see Tiger say what he did. The intro to the clip, though, was couched in terms of Tiger becoming embroiled in controversy for failing to take a stand for equal accomodation. I also enjoyed his forthrightness towards the photographers flashing their strobes as he was standing over the ball. I would have enjoyed it even more if it had extended to a little Happy Gilmore-like treatment of them.
21 posted on 07/19/2002 3:05:14 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson