Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JameRetief
I thought that a patent requires a person to have control of their invention, and that the invention is not in the public domain, as is JPEG.
2 posted on 07/23/2002 11:09:34 AM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PatrioticAmerican
"ISO will withdraw the standard: JPEG will be no more,"

So the "standard" will cease to exist.
The file format remains known and will continue to exist in the public domain.

3 posted on 07/23/2002 11:12:45 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: PatrioticAmerican
That is a good question.
20 years is a long time.
5 posted on 07/23/2002 11:17:56 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: PatrioticAmerican
JPEG has never been in the public domain. I will repost what is written in the libjpeg software:

This software is copyright (C) 1991-1998, Thomas G. Lane. All Rights Reserved except as specified below.
...
It appears that the arithmetic coding option of the JPEG spec is covered by patents owned by IBM, AT&T, and Mitsubishi. Hence arithmetic coding cannot legally be used without obtaining one or more licenses. For this reason, support for arithmetic coding has been removed from the free JPEG software. (Since arithmetic coding provides only a marginal gain over the unpatented Huffman mode, it is unlikely that very many implementations will support it.) So far as we are aware, there are no patent restrictions on the remaining code.

28 posted on 07/23/2002 8:41:17 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson