All the above MAY be true......BUT.....it DOES NOT automatically make him the killer.....The prosecution screwed this case up by not PROVING how the blood got there....how (and this is BIG for me)DW managed to get her out of her house without leaving ONE piece of evidence.
Someone posted awhile back that the evidence collected against him could have possibly fit many people in the neiborhood. God forbid that one of my neighbors children plays in my house and then goes missing on a weekend i decide to take off on my Harley. I have left many times not knowing exactly where i was going until i got home. Somethings look bad for DW (he may really have done it) but i could not send him to the death gurney because the DA has not removed ALL REASONABLE doubt from my mind. If he did it and gets off, it is the DA's FAULT.......They have built a case on assumptions NOT proof....there are innocent explanations (in the absence of proof)no matter how far fetched, as to how the evidence they have, could have gotten there.
With that said i'd probably have to vote guilty on the kiddie porn charge.
I wouldn't, unless it's a "strict liability" type crime. If hte standard for guilt for possession of kiddy porn is that the defendant KNOWINGLY possessed items which a reasonable person believed were kiddy porn, then I wouldn't vote to convict, because the prosecution has not proved to me that he actually KNEW that the stuff was on his computer.