Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accused September 11 plotter Zacarias Moussaoui withdraws guilty pleas.
CNN ^ | July 25, 2002

Posted on 07/25/2002 11:44:15 AM PDT by jern

Accused September 11 plotter Zacarias Moussaoui withdraws guilty pleas.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guilty; leoniebrinkema; plea; zacariasmoussaoui
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 07/25/2002 11:44:16 AM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jern
Accused September 11 plotter Zacarias Moussaoui withdraws guilty pleas. Details soon.
For the latest news, watch CNN or log on to
AOL Keyword: CNN
2 posted on 07/25/2002 11:45:14 AM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Moussaoui Guilty Pleas Are in Doubt

ALEXANDRIA, Va., Jul 25, 2002 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- Zacarias Moussaoui declared Thursday he was guilty of four of six charges in a federal indictment accusing him of conspiracy in connection with the Sept. 11. But the judge said she didn't believe he was ready to admit his full guilt.

"At this point I do not believe you are prepared to make a guilty plea because you are not prepared to admit the essence of the conspiracy," U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema said after Moussaoui tried to plead guilty to the first charge in his indictment.

The exchange placed in doubt Moussaoui's efforts to plead to some of the charges against him.

Moussaoui, a Frenchman and the lone person charged with conspiring with the September hijackers, balked when the judge asked him directly if he had joined with members of al-Qaida in a plan to seize aircraft.

"I want a recess," he asked. The judge agreed.

The court must decide whether to accept any of the four guilty pleas Moussaoui said he wants to make, and was spending Thursday reviewing how much he was willing to admit to.

"Today, I truthfully will enter on some of the charges, not all, a plea of guilty," Moussaoui told the judge.

"It should not be misunderstood that I endorse the entire indictment. There is enough factual basis for me to plead guilty in a truthful manner," the French citizen said.

Moussaoui told the court he intended to plead guilty to the first four charges in the indictment against him, accusing him of conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism, aircraft piracy, aircraft destruction and using weapons of mass destruction.

But the only man charged in the September attacks said he was not pleading to the last two charges. Those two charges accuse him of attempting to murder government employees and attempting to destroy property.

When the judge began to ask him about his role in the Sept. 11 conspiracy, Moussaoui gave his own explanation as his mother from France watched on in the audience.

"They allege I provided a guest house, I accept," he said. "If they allege provide training, it is possible for me to accept," he said. "I plead guilty to what is in the indictment, but it still doesn't put me on the plane."

Brinkema ruled she did not believe Moussaoui was prepared to admit guilt on the first charge - the one which accused him of conspiring to commit terrorism.

"I want to plead only for what I did, not for what they say I did," Moussaoui declared at one point in the proceedings.

Some of the charges against Moussaoui carry the death penalty, and even if the judge accepted some of his guilty pleas, the court likely would have to hold a trial to determine the penalty.

During the middle of the hearing, the court was informed that a federal appeals court had rejected a request from a private lawyer who tried to represent Moussaoui. The lawyer wanted to stop the hearing.

Before Moussaoui made his statements, Brinkema also rejected a request by Moussaoui's court-appointed attorneys to delay Thursday's arraignment and to order a full-scale mental evaluation. The lawyers, whom Moussaoui fired, have been arguing that they believe he is mentally ill and unable to represent himself.

They cited as evidence more than a hundred handwritten court briefs that Moussaoui has made - some making wild allegations.

"His pleadings are somewhat confrontational and somewhat unusual ... but they do not give the court any basis to assume that the defendant is not competent," the judge ruled.

Brinkema noted that Moussaoui "obviously understood the court's admonition" to stop filing repetitive motions. The court "did not receive a filing from him in a week. That's a record," she quipped.

At one point, Brinkema asked Moussaoui to take an oath. He had repeatedly objected to swearing on a Christian bible, so she permitted him to make an amended oath.

"In the name of Allah ... I will tell the truth to the best of my ability," Moussaoui swore.

He appeared with a beard and in traditional green prison jumpsuit, flanked by two U.S. marshals. Moussaoui's mother, Aicha el-Wafi, traveled from France and sat in the audience.

Brinkema noted that the mother had written the court urging that her son's guilty pleas not be permitted.

Brinkema had sent a letter to Moussaoui noting that she had asked the government to outline the facts of the case against him. She asked him if he had seen the letter and agreed with the government's facts.

"If I were to agree to all their facts, I would not only plead guilty but guilty for the death penalty," he responded.

Moussaoui said the government has not allowed him to tell what he knows to a grand jury but said he wanted to use Thursday's court session to divulge what he knew about Sept. 11.

Moussaoui said the crux of the case against him is "whether I came to the U.S. to commit acts of terrorism. ... That's what I want to talk to U.S. people, Americans, who are my enemies."

U.S. Attorney Paul McNulty had argued that Moussaoui was competent to make his own plea and that his defense lawyers request was "an attempt to add an artificial barrier to the defendant's clear intent to plead guilty."

Already heavy security at the U.S. Courthouse not far from the Pentagon, site of one of the Sept. 11 attacks, was tightened further for Moussaoui's appearance.

The defendant was driven to the courthouse roughly two hours hours before his scheduled appearance.

The security perimeter of hydraulic barriers was widened for Moussaoui's return to the courtroom where he attempted a week earlier to plead guilty.

That plea was rejected by Brinkema, who told Moussaoui last week to return to court and decide whether he still wanted to plead guilty to a terrorism conspiracy.

"Bet on me I will," said the unpredictable Moussaoui, who is representing himself and won't communicate with the lawyers who filed the postponement request.

Moussaoui last week admitted he was a member of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network but in the past has denied aiding the hijackers. Brinkema told him he could not plead guilty by denying his personal role.

The only individual charged in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks, Moussaoui said he had information about the conspiracy that he believed would save his life in a penalty phase of the case. The Bush administration has said it would seek his execution if Moussaoui is found guilty.

Frank Dunham Jr., the lead defense lawyer, said Wednesday that a report from defense mental health experts reinforced their earlier view of Moussaoui's illness.

That report concluded there was "reasonable cause to believe that this defendant suffers from a psychotic mental disease or defect and has been exibiting marked deterioration in his mental state since he was permitted to proceed" as his own lawyer.

Dunham said the experts need more time to determine whether Moussaoui is legally competent to proceed. Brinkema disagreed.

By LARRY MARGASAK Associated Press Writer

Copyright 2002 Associated Press, All rights reserved


3 posted on 07/25/2002 11:46:12 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
I'm astonished! He changed his mind?????
4 posted on 07/25/2002 11:46:37 AM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jern
exhibit A in the argument for military tribunals. This a$$h--- would have been dead months ago.
5 posted on 07/25/2002 11:48:40 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Moussaoui Withdraws Sept.11 Conspiracy Guilty Plea

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (Reuters) - Zacarias Moussaoui on Thursday withdrew his guilty pleas to charges of conspiracy in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.

One week after District Judge Leonie Brinkema refused to accept his guilty plea, Moussaoui appeared in court to first say was going to plead guilty, but then after a brief recess changed his mind.

"Because of my obligation to my creator, Allah, and to save and defend my life I withdraw my guilty plea," he told a packed courtroom in still another stunning change of events.

The judge accepted his decision and said the government cannot use his earlier plea against him.

Last week Moussaoui, 34, pleaded guilty and stunned a court by saying he was a member of al Qaeda, had knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks and had pledged his allegiance to Osama bin Laden.

The United States blames bin Laden and al Qaeda for the hijacked plane attacks that killed 3,000 people. U.S. officials believe Moussaoui, a French citizen of Moroccan descent who was detained on immigration charges on Sept. 11, was meant to be the 20th hijacker.

6 posted on 07/25/2002 11:49:09 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Isn't conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction one of the counts that carries the death penalty?

I wonder why he refuses to plead guilty to conspiracy to murder federal officials. Was he not aware that the Pentagon and other buildings in Washington were targets?

7 posted on 07/25/2002 11:49:44 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Why in hell is this judge so adamant about getting this guy off? Lemme guess. A terrorist-hugging Clinton appointee.
8 posted on 07/25/2002 11:52:04 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Moussaoui, a Frenchman and the lone person charged with conspiring with the September hijackers, balked when the judge asked him directly if he had joined with members of al-Qaida in a plan to seize aircraft.

Yup, I knew this was going to happen. He was going to enter the guilty plea, but as soon as the judge got into Zac admitting to the specifics of the counts in the complaint, he was going to say, "no way, Jose."

Just more games in Moussoui's case.

9 posted on 07/25/2002 11:55:44 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
Subscribe to the Tech Law
Journal Daily E-Mail Alert

Tech Law Journal

dome.gif (2049 bytes)
News, records, and analysis of legislation, litigation, and
regulation affecting the computer and Internet industry

Home | Calendar | Subscribe to Daily E-Mail Alert | Back Issues of E-Mail
Antitrust | Broadband | Censorship | Education | Employment
Encryption | Intelpro | Internet | Politics | Privacy | Securities | Tax | Telecom


Leonie Brinkema Biography

U.S. District Court Judge, Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan Courthouse, 401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314-5798.   703-299-2116.

Judge Brinkema recently presided in two Internet related cases which received wide publicity, Urofsky v. Allen and Mainstream Loudoun v. Loudoun County Library.

See, Summary of Mainstream Loudoun v. Loudoun County Library.

In the Loudoun case website operators and authors whose web pages may have been blocked asked the federal court to prevent the county public library from using Internet blocking software on public access computers in the library. All plaintiffs alleged that use of the software violated their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Judge Brinkema agreed, and found the library's policy unconstitutional. The library decided not to appeal.

The Congress is very likely to pass a bill requiring schools and libraries receiving e-rate subsidies to use filtering software. In the inevitable legal challenge, the ACLU will rely heavily on Judge Brinkema's November 23, 1998 Opinion in the Loudoun case.

In the Urofsky case several Virginia state employees challenged the constitutionality of a state statute barring state employees from using their computers at work to view porn. Judge Brinkema agreed, and held the statute unconstitutional. Virginia appealed, and Judge Brinkema was reversed by a unanimous Opinion of a three judge Court of Appeals panel.

Education:

  • Douglass College, B.A., 1966.
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, graduate studies in philosophy, 1966.
  • NYU, graduate studies in philosophy, 1967-1969.
  • Rutgers, M.L.S., 1970.
  • Cornell, J.D., 1976.

Work Experience.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, 1976-1977.
  • U.S. Attorney's office, E.D. Virginia, Criminal Division, 1977-1983.
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, 1983-4.
  • Solo Practitioner, 1984-5.
  • U.S. Magistrate Judge, E.D. Virginia, 1985-1993.

U.S. District Court Judge.

  • Nominated by President Bill Clinton.

  • Entered duty 10/23/93.

10 posted on 07/25/2002 11:56:45 AM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
With Brinkema as the judge, Moussaoui doesn't need any defense lawyers.
11 posted on 07/25/2002 11:57:35 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
Because this is one smart judge. She wants Moussaoui locked into a plea and sentence that cannot be reversed by the Court of Appeals.
12 posted on 07/25/2002 11:57:57 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
He's jerking around the USA criminal justice system. Just like everything else they do, this one will boomarang back at em. Military Tribunals will gain popularity. Ashcroft and company are loving this mockery.
13 posted on 07/25/2002 11:58:11 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Isn't conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction one of the counts that carries the death penalty?

What weapon of mass destruction did he conspire to use?

Are you sure you not meaning to say "use a vehicle of mass transportation as a weapon" or how ever it was worded?

Oh, and including airplanes in the definition of a means of mass transit was thrown out by a court. Seems congress has a dictionary all its own to define words, and an airplane doesnt count as a method of transportation as the definition in congresses dictionary for the purpose of writting and iterrupting laws limits methods of transportation to things that operate on THE GROUND!

They did a poor job of writing the law, which is always the case when they rush.

14 posted on 07/25/2002 11:58:41 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aristeides

This does not pass the smell test. I felt that last week when he pled guilty, and the judge wouldn't accept his plea. Some trick is afoot, and he's gonna walk. I feel it in my bones.
15 posted on 07/25/2002 11:59:10 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
"Why in hell is this judge so adamant about getting this guy off? Lemme guess. A terrorist-hugging Clinton appointee."

It might be that she is following Plato's injunction to "Know thyself."

If so, she knows that as a magistrate judge, and now as a District Court Judge, she has a horrible reversal record.
Therefore, she might want to go very slowly, or she will end up doing it twice, ( or if jeopardy attaches) might inadvertently set him free.
16 posted on 07/25/2002 11:59:23 AM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
"Because this is one smart judge. She wants Moussaoui locked into a plea and sentence that cannot be reversed by the Court of Appeals."

You are right, and it is fukking obvious to anyone with half a brain.
17 posted on 07/25/2002 12:00:42 PM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jern
A little Moussaoui trial music from "old blue eyes".
18 posted on 07/25/2002 12:00:54 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
This guy is a freakin' yo yo, in more ways than one..... Sheesh.
19 posted on 07/25/2002 12:02:18 PM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
The judge is being adamant about making sure that the defendant is properly informed of his rights before he acts so as to minimize the basis for post-trial appeals.
20 posted on 07/25/2002 12:05:17 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson