Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Say Slow Recall of Meat Threatened Consumers
The New York Times ^ | 7/27/02 | Greg Winter

Posted on 07/27/2002 3:01:40 PM PDT by GeneD

A sluggish investigation by the Agriculture Department into evidence that tainted meat had entered the marketplace exposed thousands of consumers to potentially deadly bacteria, possibly contributing to some illnesses, members of Congress said yesterday.

Though federal law requires daily inspections, nearly 100 days elapsed from when ConAgra Beef began producing the questionable beef and last week, when the department announced the second-largest meat recall, Democrats in the House and Senate pointed out.

"The long delay between contamination and recall is striking," the Democrats, including Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois and Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, wrote in a letter to Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman.

They and others characterized the delay as a "red flag for our nation's food safety system."

The criticism was issued as the scope of the E. coli outbreak continued to expand. At least 28 people in seven states have fallen ill from the meat, 9 more than initially reported when the department announced the 19-million-pound recall. Seven people have been hospitalized.

Even after government tests confirmed the presence of E. coli in meat that was making its way to stores, it took a month before a full recall began, and that led the lawmakers to say the Bush administration was backing away from regulation at the consumer's expense.

"The public health is not being protected by the government," Mr. Waxman said. "I'm afraid that we're moving in the wrong direction."

The Agriculture Department called the criticism unfair, pointing out that the largest meat recall, of 25 million pounds of beef, took even longer to initiate in President Bill Clinton's second term.

Science, not politics, dictates the speed at which smidgens of contaminated meat can be traced from their origins, department officials said, and a recall could not have been justified until investigators knew for certain that ConAgra was at fault.

"Unless you have the proof, you don't want to falsely accuse anyone," a spokesman for the department, Steven Cohen, said.

The dispute coincides with an admission by prison officials in Colorado, the center of the outbreak, that a warden at the Buena Vista prison deliberately served recalled beef as meatloaf to hundreds of inmates on Saturday, confident that high cooking temperatures would eradicate bacteria.

A spokeswoman for the Colorado Corrections Department, Alison Morgan, said that 2,600 pounds of recalled meat had been served to inmates in a month and a half, mostly unwittingly, and that no illnesses had resulted. Although the warden broke no internal rules, Ms. Morgan added, the department has returned the remaining beef.

"It's outrageous," said Representative Diana DeGette, Democrat of Colorado.

"What would happen," Ms. DeGette said, "if the principal at your child's school knew meat was contaminated and decided, `Well, let's just serve it up anyway'?"

The controversy over the recall has prompted legislation to tighten food inspection laws, but even with tougher rules, the Agriculture Department said, its reaction could not have been much swifter.

Although it found traces of E. coli on May 14 at a meat wholesaler in Denver, it took more than two months, including 15 days of required tests, to track the contamination involving ConAgra.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: annveneman; conagra; dianadegette; ecoli; henrywaxman; richarddurbin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/27/2002 3:01:40 PM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Is this the DNC backup plan in case the corporate accounting/Harken stuff doesn't work out?

Just for fun, try making your own DNC talking points to help manufacture the next so-called scandal. Here's one: the Bush administration is too close to Big Meat.





2 posted on 07/27/2002 3:14:53 PM PDT by j271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Wow. Any port in a storm, I guess.
3 posted on 07/27/2002 3:18:13 PM PDT by Skwidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The dispute coincides with an admission by prison officials in Colorado, the center of the outbreak, that a warden at the Buena Vista prison deliberately served recalled beef as meatloaf to hundreds of inmates on Saturday, confident that high cooking temperatures would eradicate bacteria.

And he would be exactly right.

4 posted on 07/27/2002 3:20:47 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"Unless you have the proof, you don't want to falsely accuse anyone," a spokesman for the department, Steven Cohen, said.

Unless you are the Tyson Company and you want to run your primary competitor out of business. Then the rules change, especially if your footstool is the president.

5 posted on 07/27/2002 3:36:57 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
"The dispute coincides with an admission by prison officials in Colorado, the
center of the outbreak..."

These people are getting worse and worse about how they phrase things to slant them against the Republicans. The above sentence gives the impression that the prison (instead of Colorado) was the center of the outbreak, even though no one in the prison got sick.

6 posted on 07/27/2002 3:46:28 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: facedown
And he would be exactly right.

Hey! Keep your scientific accuracy out of our polemics!

7 posted on 07/27/2002 3:49:19 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: j271
They're STILL on the Harkin thing. Today on radio I heard a speaker say that Bush wants to pass a law against the very thing he did himself. He didn't bother to mention that Bush has been cleared 5 times by the SEC. They neglect to say that what Bush did in honesty could also be done dishonestly and so Bush wants a law to make sure they can't cheat. Actually Bush is a shining example of what's right, but they twist that around, too.
8 posted on 07/27/2002 3:51:41 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: j271
Didn't I read on FR the other day that Clinton allowed the meat processors to "investigate" themselves?
9 posted on 07/27/2002 3:53:53 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Democrats Say Slow Recall of Meat Threatened Consumers

Not if you cook it before you eat it.

10 posted on 07/27/2002 4:00:27 PM PDT by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer; All
I think Free Republic response threads should be required reading for everyone!! Have you all ever considered starting a print newspaper?! "America Today" sounds good... ;-)
11 posted on 07/27/2002 4:02:12 PM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
These people are getting worse and worse about how they phrase things to slant them against the Republicans.

I agree with you in general but in this particular case I think it's probably just sloppy writing.

12 posted on 07/27/2002 4:07:54 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Hey! Keep your scientific accuracy out of our polemics!

It can be an annoying trait. 8^)

13 posted on 07/27/2002 4:09:18 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Couldn't the author have at least pointed out that the cook's belief was accurate and that the only problem with "contaminated" meat is that sometimes meat isn't cooked as thoroughly as it should be?
14 posted on 07/27/2002 4:14:12 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Nah, it doesn't advance the agenda.
15 posted on 07/27/2002 4:22:23 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
100 days elapsed from when ConAgra Beef began producing the questionable beef and last week, when the department announced the second-largest meat recall,...

100 day old fresh meat in the stores? I think I'll become vegetarian again.

Upton Sinclair, where are you when we need you?

16 posted on 07/27/2002 4:24:54 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j271
Just for fun, try making your own DNC talking points to help manufacture the next so-called scandal. Here's one: the Bush administration is too close to Big Meat.

Naw, Clinton grabbed the Big Meat headlines, so to speak.

17 posted on 07/27/2002 4:52:49 PM PDT by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death
Clinton grabbed the Big Meat headlines

I thought it was Monica who grabbed the Little Meat??

18 posted on 07/27/2002 5:08:23 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
RATs are experts on tainted meat...
19 posted on 07/27/2002 5:31:48 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The Agriculture Department called the criticism unfair, pointing out that the largest meat recall, of 25 million pounds of beef, took even longer to initiate in President Bill Clinton's second term. Science, not politics, dictates the speed at which smidgens of contaminated meat can be traced from their origins, department officials said, and a recall could not have been justified until investigators knew for certain that ConAgra was at fault.

"Unless you have the proof, you don't want to falsely accuse anyone," a spokesman for the department, Steven Cohen, said.

What do logic and fair play have to do with it? Nothing according to liberals. Not a peep from them on X42's watch, notice? I just hope the public will see through this smoke screen (though I don't hold out hope).

Thorough cooking kills bacteria (duh).

If I had just one wish, and couldn't use it for personal gain, this is what I would choose:


20 posted on 07/27/2002 6:16:37 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson