You havne't SEEN me go after Enron yet. I have very strong negative opinions about corporate fraudulent accounting. I don't know if there are threads on those issues but I haven't been on them much if there are. So you really wouldn't know my positions. But that just makes me despise JW all the more. Klayman has no desire to actually make a difference. He just uses the issues of the day to promote his own personal agenda. He is to corruption what Elmer Gantry was to religion. (Are you old enoght to know who Elmer Gantry is/was?)
I can't speak for others, but this is my beef against Klayman. He will exploit a couple of ignorant minor stockholders with maybe a very small loss or even a gain to be plaintiffs in a totally bogus suit against Halliburton because that is the burning issue of the day and because he would walk on hot coals to get Bush impeached. He uses people's good impulses to take advantage of them.
I think that Hilliburton case was bogus. I'm willing to watch, but Larry's going to have to do better than he's done so far. Frankly this move made him look like a full blown idiot as far as I was concerned.
If Haliburton did enguage in shadey accounting practices that Cheney participated in, I want to see it. But it better be on the up and up or Larry's as big an idiot as you say, at least on this case.
As for Enron, I am severly pi--ed that heads haven't rolled yet. What does it take?
I think Ashcroft has about thirty years worth of prosecutions backed up if he'd only start taking things to court that we know about. I was very disappointed when I found that Clinton was getting a pass. There are so many avenues to go after him. I simply refuse to believe that none are legit. As for Larry, if he's as bad as you say, he'll get his sooner or later.