Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRAFICANT knows why the ECONOMY is TANKING -PRINCIPLE OF FAILURE TO YIELD
Dave Franklin ^ | Augest 1, 2002 | Dave Franklin

Posted on 07/31/2002 6:04:10 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate

PRINCIPLE OF FAILURE TO YIELD
JAMES TRAFICANT'S BIGGEST BLUNDER

By: Dave Franklin

On March 14, 2000, Representative Jim Traficant (D-OH) stood on the floor in the House of Representatives and said, "I want to yield back the gutless wonders of the United States International Trade Commission and the Clinton-Gore administration that appointed them." The Ohio Congressman has a knack for telling it like it is. But that is not what got him in trouble.

Traficant doesn't pull any punches. And neither did the elite global establishment in its persecution of the eight-term Congressman. Can anyone honestly claim he would have been prosecuted and expelled from Congress if he didn't stand as the only opposition to selling out our jobs, and our sovereignty? Traficant believed he was the target of a vendetta by the Clinton Administration for his brazen attacks on the most corrupt President and Attorney General in history.

It's easy to see why he would think that. During the heat of the presidential election in 2000, while other Democrats were circling wagons around the Clinton-Gore administration in hopes of keeping the White House, Traficant was blasting the leader of his party with no regard for personal consequences. Here's a sample of the famous closing statements from Traficant early in 2000.

- "I yield back the fact that Wal-Mart now owns, owns and sells 14 brands of shoes, and they are all made in China." 2/01/00

- "I yield back the lack of oversight on the Justice Department of the United States." 3/23/00

- "I yield back the crimes of the FBI at Waco, Texas, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho." 2/29/00

- "I yield back the millions of audits and gouging of the American taxpayers." 3/08/00

- "I yield back all the sex, drugs, and murder on television." 3/09/00

- "I yield back the failed national drug strategy that we have in effect." 3/16/00

- "Mr. Speaker, I yield back the corruption in the Justice Department." 3/21/00

- "I yield back the fact that these overburdening regulations in America are killing American jobs and
forcing American companies to move overseas." 3/22/00

- "I yield back the manipulations of both American citizens and our great Constitution by the Census Bureau." 3/28/00

But what James A. Traficant, Jr. either realizes and never talks about, or doesn't realize, is that the enemy he made for himself was not just the Clinton Administration. During the speech he concluded by yielding back the "gutless wonders" of the U.S. Trade representative and the Clinton-Gore administration, Traficant made a stand for a dying steel company in his district, Bliss Manufacturing.

"Mr. Speaker, Bliss Manufacturing in my district makes bumpers for General Motors. Not any more. Bliss bankrupted yesterday, putting 500 of my workers on the street due to two reasons: number one, the continuing flood of illegal steel imports; and number two, after a recent decision by the United States International Trade Commission that ruled in favor of Japan, Russia, Brazil, and Korea." Such was the principled stand that Traficant made for people he represented.

But what James Traficant didn't say, is that steel imports being promoted by the U.S. Trade Commission were part of an effort to move America's manufacturing sector overseas. Labor is cheap overseas, and low-wage or no-wage workers making raw steel would mean larger profit margins for companies that sell products made of steel. These include General Electric, General Motors, and every other supplier of cars or appliances.

Jim Traficant had the "misfortune" of representing a district whose economy was based on production of steel. Ohio's Mahoning Valley was established on early 20th century mills that produced the metal upon which our industrial revolution was built. And James Traficant believed in representing his constituents. Throughout the 80s and 90s, his district was getting the imported steel shaft.

Traficant blamed his downfall on persecution by Janet Reno's Justice Department. And he was right that it was Reno's people who set him up and knocked him down. But his nemesis is far bigger than a former Attorney General, running a soon-to-be-failed campaign for the Florida Governor's office.

By going after the U.S. Trade Representative, Traficant attacked the agent of multinational corporations, who needed support from the U.S. Government in their effort to exploit cheap foreign labor. Even if he didn't know it, James Traficant had picked a fight with the biggest dog on the block.

Traficant is a tough cookie and he fought back. His March 28, 2000 proposal to create an independent federal agency that would investigate allegations of corruption on the part of Justice Department personnel was a counter-punch. But he was throwing punches at the wrong enemy.

Janet Reno left Washington in 2001. The global attack dog was still biting Traficant. He was expelled from Congress on July 25, 2002 by a vote of 420 to one, with 8 abstaining. It's notable that the only one to vote against removing James Traficant was Gary Condit.

Clinton's Justice Department was a means to an end. The charges they laid out against Traficant were dubious. And it is certainly questionable as to whether Traficant ever got a fair trial. He may, after all, be vindicated in appellant court. But if he is to defeat the forces against him, he must identify what and who they are.

Traficant can't win by fighting a phantom vendetta.

Jim Traficant was ruined because he wouldn't yield to a global establishment program of selling out American jobs. Any member of Congress who didn't vote to expel him could well face the same retribution. That is why Republicans, who had no loyalty to Reno's Justice Department, voted to remove him.

And that's why Gary Condit voted against it. Condit is already ruined, free to vote his conscience without yielding, such as that may be.

"Published originally at EtherZone.com " : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbusiness; bigprofits; globalism; nwo; ussellout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
You want to seem him tell it like it is and rip the United States International Trade Commission and the Clinton-Gore administration? Read his One-Minute Speeches below.

Rep. James Traficant's One-Minute Speeches, 1997

James Traficant's One-Minute Speeches, 1998

James Traficant's One-Minute Speeches, 1999

James Traficant's One-Minute Speeches, 2000

James Traficant's One-Minute Speeches, 2001

1 posted on 07/31/2002 6:04:10 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: backhoe
bump for posterity
2 posted on 07/31/2002 6:06:26 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
He may, after all, be vindicated in appellant court. But if he is to defeat the forces against him, he must identify what and who they are.

I hope both of those things happen.

3 posted on 07/31/2002 6:15:24 PM PDT by kcpopps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
I like Traficant. I'd vote for Traficant today ... but I'd button-hole him real fast and tell him to cut out the petty criminal crap IF he did it.

The next time around, I think he'd be enough of a man, and enough of a Patriotic American to shape up and be satisfied to live a normal life like the rest of us working stiffs.

4 posted on 07/31/2002 6:24:29 PM PDT by CIBvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CIBvet
I've always liked Mr. Traficant. What I would like to know is why Mr. Traficant gets 8 years in prison and Torrecelli walks.
5 posted on 07/31/2002 6:46:40 PM PDT by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: It'salmosttolate
Traficant is a crook and a populist, with a strong element of bombast and ignorance that make him even more of a caricature. I agree that a large part of the devoted attention the law has paid him was due to his unpopular opinions on Clinton, but that in no way mitigates his crimes nor the fact that the causes he seized upon were often corrupt in and of themselves (protectionism for big steel? C'mon...plenty of modern small mill are able to compete these days, and protectionism only prolongs the agony of the aging dinosaurs at the expense of the consumer).

I don't think I'll miss him much.
7 posted on 07/31/2002 7:19:07 PM PDT by Lizard_King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King
I don't think you will either. You NWO lackie
8 posted on 07/31/2002 7:23:01 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
The Ohio Congressman has a knack for telling it like it is.

Jim Traficant has a knack for self-promotion, accompanied by a flamboyant fashion style and a bellowing voice interlaced with crude homilies, pretentious rhetoric, and occasional flatulence.

He is Ohio's answer to Al Sharpton.

9 posted on 07/31/2002 7:24:57 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
"If it's on the dress, he must confess."

Did anyone tell you that crook from Ohio voted to exonerate that raping crook from Arkansas?

10 posted on 07/31/2002 7:32:06 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King
Populism makes me break out in hives.
11 posted on 07/31/2002 7:32:48 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
I know he did. I DISPISE HIM FOR THAT.

But you probably have done stupid things also.
But that doesn't make you a bad person.

12 posted on 07/31/2002 7:35:59 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
What doesn't?
13 posted on 07/31/2002 7:36:06 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
Yeah - but he's consistently voted to make me pay higher prices for consumer goods. For that, I can never forgive him. Good Riddance.
14 posted on 07/31/2002 7:39:13 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Tasty waves and cool buds...
15 posted on 07/31/2002 7:39:38 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Globalism makes me break out in hives.
16 posted on 07/31/2002 7:40:53 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
Ad hominem attacks...the last refuge of those with no point their arguments.

It's funny how when someone else is in favour of a position they are willing to defend rationally, they suddenly become lackies.

Please, present an argument why what I said was wrong, or how I have maligned Traficant's record. The man, like most Dems and a significant number of Reps, is almost too easy to loathe.
17 posted on 07/31/2002 7:54:39 PM PDT by Lizard_King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
Define your terms. If by Globalism you mean the desire to make America another subservient cog in the UN machine, then I am in full agreement with you.

However, given the context of your statement, i can only assume you mistake a principled stance in favour of free markets (defensible both from a moral and utilitarian perspective) for the ideological dogmatism of globalism. So to keep up the motif established thus far...socialism makes ME break out in hives...whether it masquerades as the product of the elite (Algore) or as the power of the people (Traficant, McCain, etc).
18 posted on 07/31/2002 7:59:52 PM PDT by Lizard_King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
I yield back the Constitution that mandates a two-thirds ratification vote of the U.S. Senate to enact a treaty, if anybody abides by the Constitution around here.

Traficant is dead right on this one. I have been saying for years (perhaps a decade) that so-called Trade Agreements are, in reality, Illegal Treaties disguised as 'Agreements'. It was bound to happen. Once Congress realized that they could simply rename an unconstitutional act, such as a Bill of Attainder, to a reasonably sounding one, such as Asset Forfeiture, and effectively trick the people out of their rights, the sky was the limit on usurpation.

BTW, the real Philip Freneau, as the Editor of the National Gazette, explained this trickery (and much more) in a 1792 editorial satire titled, "Rules for changing a limited representative republic into an unlimited heredity one."

19 posted on 07/31/2002 7:59:54 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King
He may be guilty as hell but I don't think you read a word of his one minute speeches, because if you did and you don't see how the US is being destroyed so we can have a one world gov't under the UN, then this is exactly what you are in favor of.
20 posted on 07/31/2002 8:00:55 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson